Skip to main content

An Upper Deck through-the-years primer

All right, the Topps apologists are getting their unmentionables in a bunch. They say Upper Deck always looks the same. They can't tell one year from the next. Everything blends together. It makes them feel like they wasted five bucks every time they open a pack.

I gotcha. Perhaps you've heard -- I feel the same way. It can be difficult to decipher the subtleties of the UD brand. I mean, if you had only 10 seconds to place the year with the Upper Deck card, could you do it with these four?

I probably could. But I'm a card expert. I blog about cards for a living. Well, not for a living. It's more like I blog about cards for my sanity. But you get the idea. I think about cards a lot. So sometimes knowledge seeps into the ol' noggin.

But what about the rest of you poor souls? How are you ever going to be able to tell the 2008 Upper Deck base card from the 2003 Upper Deck base card? A work promotion could be riding on your very answer. Or at least a card contest.

That's where I come in. Right here on this post, I am going to feature a card from each year of Upper Deck going back to 2000. I could go back farther, but the last 10 years is about where the confusion lies. (But don't ask me to tell '96 and '97 UD apart -- I still don't know).

Bookmark this post. When you are sitting there with your Upper Deck cards in your hand, and your lady friend tells you to find the UD set that corresponds with the year you two first dated, you are definitely going to want to have this post handy.

Pay close attention:

2010 Upper Deck

2009 Upper Deck

2008 Upper Deck

2007 Upper Deck

2006 Upper Deck

2005 Upper Deck

2004 Upper Deck

2003 Upper Deck

2002 Upper Deck

2001 Upper Deck
 (yeah, I know he's facing the wrong way. I have like 6 cards from 2001).

2000 Upper Deck

You're welcome. Use your new Upper Deck knowledge wisely.

(Explainer: Yes, UD fans, I realize that you could take any card brand and find a simliar pose for each year. That's not my point. My point is there are only so many different kinds of photos you can take. Upper Deck is quite good at taking photos. But if there's no design or minimal design, you can't enhance the photo or make the card distinct. A photo by itself won't make a card stand out enough to differentiate it from year-to-year.

A set won't stay in your brain on photo alone unless there's a separate memory to attach to it -- like it was the first card set you ever collected. Iconic card sets -- '75 Topps, '93 Upper Deck -- are iconic because of photo and design. A photo is rarely iconic by itself unless it's Glenn Hubbard wearing a boa constrictor. True, you can't make an iconic set every time. But there's zero chance at all if you're not going to try).

Anyway, while going through my UD cards, I immediately noticed how this year's Upper Deck really pales in comparison to the Upper Deck cards of just a few years ago, especially 2006. That's probably because of its half-attempt to hide logos. Too bad Upper Deck didn't go full-on rebel and show logos in all of their glory like in years past. Now, that would be something to admire.

But the biggest disappointment for me, by far, has been the same disappointment there has been with UD ever since 1993, when Upper Deck was king.

I'm still waiting for an encore. But I don't think I'm going to get one.


SpastikMooss said…
Oh man, don't get me started on 96-97 Upper Deck. Even 96-97 Collector's Choice looks nearly the same. I was trying to sort my cards by set when I was home over Christmas, and so many of those cards ended up in the wrong pile. At least in the early 90's (90-92) they gave you the little year on the front.
capewood said…
I haven't seen any 2010 UD in my neck of the woods yet. In an earlier post you mentioned their half-assed attempt to hide the logos. Donruss got sued last year for a similar not so successful attempt to hide logos. Doesn't UD have enough legal trouble?
Adam Kaningher said…
When you see them side-by-side it's easy to pick out minute differences. A handful of these (2002, 2007) do have a rather distinctive yet boring look. But even to someone with a moderately sharp eye, 2009 and 2001 look virtually identical. And 2004 screams "1994 UD rotated 90 degrees minus gold" to me.
Good job. Only once, 2007, did they even attempt to add a little style.I just don't know what they are thinking.
Ben G said…
Gorgeous photography in the "vintage" UD. Almost all of their 2000's look alikes could have benefited from a border. Full bleed is boring.
Peterson said…
I got a sealed 92 set from the thrift for a dollar (along with a set of micro-topps 1992)
It is one of my least valuable hightreasures.
Favorite set of the 90's maybe...
93 was great, but the scripty stuff bugged me.
BA Benny said…
I get the impression that through the years Upper Deck went through periods where they thought they were doing us (the card buying public) a favor by putting out a set every year and we (the card buying public) were lucky to have them. With that type of attitude comes zero motivation to make a decent or different product. At least Topps, for better or for worse, changes their style and ideas from year to year.
Matt Runyon said…
the photography may be superior on UD cards, but borderless cards bore me.
Anonymous said…
93 UD was my fav 90s set. :)
Upper Deck hasn't wowed me with their base set in quite a long time as their current calling is much more in the high-end realm. I love their photography (even though I think they pay for the images from Getty) and wish Topps would improve the photographs in their flagship release. I hope Upper Deck keeps producing cards because it's fairly evident from recent releases (Tribute and Sterling) that Topps doesn't know how to do high-end, at all.
John Bateman said…
Not Fair! My comments

2008 - You used a rookie logo card which gives the card some pazazz (sp?)
2007 - This card seems to have border on each size
2006- Another rookie card logo
2005- Not Fair- a first pitch card. Did the 2005 regualr cards have the green upper deck logo

These card all look the same and have the awful gold foil stamp on them.

The only set or style I would say I like was the 2003 set - it worked because of the team logos
steveisjewish said…
See, I agree - UD does not have any real design element to it - but for me the photo is king - I like a lean card with sharp borders - UD brings that every year - I would rather have a nice looking card with little design than the abominations that are 10', 08' 07' etc... Topps - those are all realllly ugly cards
Anonymous said…
I want to like UD, but its gatting harder and harder to like em
GOGOSOX60 said…
There must have been something in the air back in 1993 because that is the last year I bought a box of Upper Deck cards...however I have totally ignored all their past issues since that year. Give me Topps ginger board designs every year...they may have a hit or miss but at least it's like life itself...a little variety!
Community Gum said…
It's almost like they're counterfeiting themselves. Maybe this is what really tipped Konami off.

I think '93 was one of my last UD sets for baseball. Around that time I switched over to basketball, and I remember liking a lot of those designs (until about '98 when I stopped there too).

Popular posts from this blog

This guy was everywhere

It's interesting how athletes from the past are remembered and whether they remain in the public conscious or not.

Hall of Fame players usually survive in baseball conversations long after they've played because they've been immortalized in Cooperstown. Then there are players who didn't reach the Hall but were still very good and somehow, some way, are still remembered.

Players like Dick Allen, Rusty Staub, Vida Blue and Mickey Rivers live on decades later as younger generations pick up on their legacies. Then there are all-stars like Bert Campaneris, who almost never get discussed anymore.

There is just one memory of Campaneris that younger fans most assuredly know. I don't even need to mention it. You know what's coming, even if Lerrin LaGrow didn't.

But there was much more to Campaneris than one momentary loss of reason.

A couple of months ago, when watching old baseball games on youtube hadn't gotten old yet, I was watching a World Series game from…

Some of you have wandered into a giveaway

Thanks to all who voted in the comments for their favorite 1970s Topps card of Bert Campaneris.

I didn't know how this little project would go, since I wasn't installing a poll and, let's face it, the whole theme of the post is how Campaneris these days doesn't get the respect he once did. (Also, I was stunned by the amount of folks who never heard about the bat-throwing moment. Where am I hanging out that I see that mentioned at least every other month?)

A surprising 31 people voted for their favorite Campy and the one with the most votes was the one I saw first, the '75 Topps Campy card above.

The voting totals:

'75 Campy - 11 votes
'70 Campy - 4
'72 Campy - 4
'73 Campy - 4
'76 Campy - 4
'74 Campy - 3
'78 Campy - 1

My thanks to the readers who indulged me with their votes, or even if they didn't vote, their comments on that post. To show my appreciation -- for reading, for commenting, for joining in my card talk even if it might …

Return of the king

(If you haven't voted for your favorite Bert Campaneris '70s card in the last post, I invite you to do so).

So you've been away for a few years and want everyone to know that you're back.

How do you do that?

Do what The Diamond King did when he returned to card blogging last month: Bombard readers with contests and giveaways! Well, you've certainly gotten MY attention, sir!

I'll start with the giveaways first. Since he returned, the Diamond King has issued multiple "Diamond King 9" giveaways, straight out of the chute and rapid fire in the last month-plus. As I've said before, I am very slow to get to these "first come, first serve" giveaways. I used to think "I spend too much time on the computer" and now I realize "I don't spend enough time on the computer at all!"

But I was able to nab two cards out of the many giveaways.

I won this key 1981 Fleer Star Sticker of The Hawk. I have since acquired several more &#…