Skip to main content

The most tedious aspect of collecting


I just mentioned that I don't find sorting tedious at all. While some people agonize over organizing a giant lot of cards, I find just about every aspect of sorting relaxing and a good way to detoxify.

I'm a bit of a strange bird in that way. I seem to have patience for hobby particulars that provoke groans in other collectors.

I don't really mind scanning cards. Yeah, it can take awhile but my brain automatically categorized scanning into the work needed to create a post. It's required if you want your blog to have pretty pictures and, you know, have people look at it. It's part-and-parcel for the whole operation.

Same deal with cropping. This can get laborious but I don't whine about it -- not even when the card comes out crooked and I have to scan it again and I drop the scanner lid too forcefully and the scan is crooked again ...

I stay chill.

But I have found what I consider the most tedious part of the hobby. It is so tedious that I'll probably be working on it the rest of my life.

It's upgrading my want list.

Some of you may know I lost the entire want list off my blog a year-and-a-half ago. I've rebuilt a portion of it, mostly Topps cards and other sets that I'm working on currently, and that took awhile.

Right now I'm at the most tedious part: recreating want lists for all of the sets that contain Dodgers cards.

I'm going back in time with those. So for Upper Deck, Fleer, Donruss, Bowman, Pacific, Score, etc., I'm trying to find every Dodger in the set and whether I need it or not.

I've been doing this for over a year. It's as painful and staking as painstaking can get. Many times I'll ignore updating the list for like two months because I. Can't. Take. It.

I've gotten through all of the sets from 2018 through 2008, with most of the 2019 sets updated, too. I am currently in the middle of 2007 and I'm pretty damn close to throwing my collection of 2007 Upper Deck cards out a second story window.

It turns out I had no idea how much I was missing for Dodger cards when I created my initial list. Here is what I typed in yesterday, relating to Upper Deck's "Predictor" cards from 2007:

Predictors: 
Green: 23-Young, 252-Gonzalez, 280-Pierre, 345-Garciaparra, 346-Furcal, 347-Betemit, 349-Martin, 350-Ethier, 351-Kemp, 352-Lofton, 353-Penny, 354-Lowe, 355-Billingsley, 356-Maddux, 357-Saito, 358-Broxton, 437-Schmidt, 492-Garciaparra
Blue: 23-Young, 252-Gonzalez, 280-Pierre, 345-Garciaparra, 346-Furcal, 347-Betemit, 349-Martin, 350-Ethier, 351-Kemp, 352-Lofton, 353-Penny, 354-Lowe, 355-Billingsley, 356-Maddux, 357-Saito, 358-Broxton, 437-Schmidt, 492-Garciaparra; 
Purple: 23-Young, 232-Gonzalez, 280-Pierre, 345-Garciaparra, 346-Furcal, 347-Betemit, 349-Martin, 350-Ethier, 351-Kemp, 352-Lofton, 353-Penny, 354-Lowe, 355-Billingsley, 356-Maddux, 357-Saito, 358-Broxton, 437-Schmidt, 492-Garciaparra, 
MVP: 50-Garciaparra, 51-Drew, 52-Furcal; Postseason: 15-Dodgers
Silver Parallel (stamped): 767-Biemel, 768-Brazoban, 770-Hendrickson, 771-Kuo, 772-Schmidt, 773-Tomko, 774-Wolf, 775-Lieberthal, 776-Anderson, 777-Kent, 778-Martinez, 779-Saenz, 780-Gonzalez, 781-Pierre, 782-Repko, 783-Garciaparra, 784-Valdez, 785-Schmidt, 796-Clark
MVP Potential: 27-Garciaparra


Yikes.

Many of those cards are just the same card with a different colored set of bars on the side (or elevator doors, since 07 UD is the Elevator Door set). It's pretty obnoxious, although not unusual at all as any collector of current cards knows.

So it's a super-slow process and keep in mind I don't even include most relic or autograph cards because I'm not interested in them enough to pay the prices for those.

When Bo of Baseball Cards Come To Life came into some Dodgers cards from around 2000-05, he asked whether my want list had been updated for those years. No, Bo, they haven't, I responded, because I'M STUCK IN 2007 HELL!

I told Bo that I wouldn't get to fully updating 2000-05 until sometime next year and I could hear how far too optimistic that sounded. I'll be lucky if I get through 2006 next year.

So I told Bo just send whatever he has, chances are something will stick. It's still a period for which I didn't collect a thing.

Here are the cards (plus the Edwin Jackson above) that I needed:


A few of those cards are actually from the late '90s, but it's still a time period for when I didn't collect and I personally lump those years all together.

I like 2000-05 better because that was when the retro cards craze began and there are plenty of interesting sets from that time. I have less to say about current players from those year though. The Dodgers weren't all that exciting then. Only so much you can say about your 151st different Kaz Ishii card.

But they are definitely appreciated because they are Dodger cards I need.

I won't be crossing them off of any lists because those lists don't exist yet.

Who knows when I'll get to them.

Comments

  1. Greg, I don't know if you'll find this helpful, but one good way of getting a team checklist for a set is to go to the set's page on TCDB (search here: https://www.tradingcarddb.com/ViewAll.cfm/sp/Baseball?MODE=Years) and then click the "Teams" link. By default it shows you the base cards but you can also click a button at the bottom that says "Include Inserts and Related Sets." Here's an example from 2010 Topps: https://www.tradingcarddb.com/ViewTeamsIns.cfm/sid/9821/team/15/Los%20Angeles%20Dodgers

    Good luck getting all your lists done!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll have to give that a try. Bit set in my ways but the frustration sometimes gets me to do something new.

      Delete
  2. you might want to take a look at my "how to make your cards look like they do in hand" page at the top of cardboard history. You can fix a crooked scan in about 1 second. No rescanning needed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. By the way, the most tedious and least fun part of the process for me is removing cards from toploaders. It almost always leads to me cutting myself on them.

      Delete
    2. Yes, I agree. The worst part of large lot is pulling cards out of the top loaders and penny sleeves. Gives me hang nails.

      Delete
  3. I like sorting most cards too, but the Sportscaster cards are so thin it becomes difficult and some of the shiny, newer cards stick together.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree that every part of the card process has its enjoyments. I would guess that part of your frustration here is not that you are doing something with new cards, but that you are re-doing something you had already. Glad you needed those cards!

    ReplyDelete
  5. My wantlist is pretty tame, since I'm not building too many sets and I have never actually inventoried all of my team collections, nor do I have any desire to track down every single card of my player collections. But if I did... creating want lists would definitely be tedious to me too.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Giving thanks for bloggers

This is my address book with the addresses of people who have traded cards with me through the mail.

I bought it maybe three months into my blogging career when I realized that you didn't just blog about cards but you actually blogged about cards that people sent you, too.

It's definitely an old-school way to file addresses. But then this is an old-school hobby and I'm still a guy who thinks if I put critical information on the computer without a physical backup, I'm going to lose everything. I never got around to getting the addresses on some sort of word document so the address book has all kinds of updates and cross-outs and ... well, it's a disaster, basically. You people move, a LOT.

However, I consider this book a tribute, a tribute to everyone who has ever sent me cards. And although not everyone in this book has a blog (or had a blog), it is also a tribute to blogging and trading through the blogs.

Lately I've seen people gravitate toward Trading Card …

Tis the season

I read today that Black Friday as we know it -- the Friday after Thanksgiving -- isn't really a thing anymore.

Several stores kicked off "Black Friday" prices back in October, people have been shopping online for cheaper Christmas prices for weeks, and crowds apparently aren't as frantic as they once were on the traditional Black Friday.

That figures, because yesterday, for the first time ever, I participated in COMC's Black Friday sale.

There are several posts on this blog where I mention that I don't do the online Black Friday sales because I either don't have the money at this time of year (buying gifts for others, you know) or because I'm just not that together with buying when deals are happening. I want what I want when I want it, and a Black Friday sale isn't going to help me if I like something on April 23rd.

But I just happened to have some extra cash this time of year for like the first time ever. I was able to brace myself to wait a co…

Stepping through the minefield of high numbers

I am in the final stages of completing the 1973 Topps baseball set.

In fact, if I do a little fudging, I've basically completed it.

-- No, I don't have all of the cards in hand. The Cleon Jones, Joe Niekro, Leo Durocher and Yankees team cards are on their way. So is the elusive final checklist card, ol' number 588. But more on that later.

-- No, I haven't acquired an extra Walter Alston card (a high number) or an extra Mike Schmidt rookie (Ron Cey's second-year card). Both reside in my Dodger card binders and I'll consider the '73 set complete even without the two extras, although I do intend on getting both at some point.

-- No, I haven't grabbed all the non-numbered team checklists. I still have the Red Sox, Indians, Twins and Padres to go. I'll get them, but I'm not going to delay my announcement of completing the set for them.

-- No, I haven't bothered with the manager variation cards or the team checklists with extra stars on the botto…