Tuesday, January 8, 2019

Burnin' your retinas in 2019


Just to underline the wild fluctuation of card content in the big box of cards I received from Jonathan, I am opening a pack of 1995 Fleer that was contained within.

OK, half my viewing audience just left.

I don't care. I am the sole arbiter of what's interesting on this blog.

I have never opened a pack of 1995 Fleer. I was starting my card collecting hiatus in '95. Once I returned, I was warned to avoid '95 Fleer. It looked strange. It smelled funny. You'll pick up bad habits, they said. You'll start hanging with the wrong crowd.

So I stayed away. I received enough cards from the product through trades and such that I became aware of how bizarre a card set it is. It's not called "the acid trip set" for nothing. It's still difficult for me to grasp what designers were thinking in the mid-to-late '90s, and nothing is a better example than 1995 Fleer. One of my unrealistic goals on this blog is to discover someone who worked on this product and have them explain the reasons behind the designs in this set. But that person may be in a padded room right now.

OK, so that's the wrapper above. It looks rather staid, although the sideways writing and the type on top of type hints at what is to come. Also, I enjoy the very 1990s boast of: "7 insert series" and the accompanying "one per pack." Do the math, kids.

This pack is apparently a different version of this pack. This one has more cards and mentions Canada, because why just traumatize one country?


Here is some of the info on the back. The odds info is more vague than what you get today.

Also:


1995 Fleer is telling you not to do drugs.

I will repeat that.

1995 Fleer is saying, "do cards, not drugs."

How tremendously self-aware.

All right, let's get to the horror within.


#400 - Tony Longmire, Phillies

The basic gist of 1995 Fleer, from what I gather, is they're going to make it as difficult as possible for you to read the card. That is their mission. "Go ahead, we dare you to read it. Yes, we put all of the player's vitals in tiny type ON THE FRONT, OVER THE PHOTO. And then we wrote some of it SIDEWAYS. Ha, ha. Try to read it, stupid card collector."

I haven't even gotten to the fact that this card is obviously radioactive.



#379 - Bill Pulsipher, Mets

All right, it's year 3705. The temperature of the earth's surface is 440 degrees. Bill Pulsipher has been transported into the future. He is now being vaporized because he did not prepare for the temperature difference. Also, please note that his forearm has melted into a molten rainbow.



#359 - Tim Scott, Expos

The numbers on the backs of these cards aren't exactly easy to read either.

The earth is getting hotter and hotter and now the whole sky is orange. Tim Scott tries to go about his business of throwing a baseball but the entire stadium is in flames. Also there are tiny words trying to trip him up.



#337 - Terry Mathews, Marlins

Have you ever wondered what a baseball player would look like if his face melted off like those bad guys in Raiders of the Lost Ark? 1995 Fleer attempts to answer that question.



#313 - Greg McMichael, Braves

Greg McMichael has been submerged into a giant sea of green jello.



#2 - Raul Mondesi, Dodgers, Pro-Vision insert

This is the one insert in the pack. Probably the lone positive moment in 1995 Fleer. Even though it's a Dodger, I wished I pulled a different insert. I have this card maybe 5 or 6 times.



#287 - Tom Henke, Rangers

We've moved to the American League West now. Tom Henke is pitching in some sort of bacteria plague. Also, there are two of him, like there is with many of the other cards in the set ... but not all of them ... because this is 1995 Fleer.



#265 - Tim Scott, Mariners

In terms of actual players featured, this pack is quite boring.



#448 - Pete Schourek, Reds

The NL Central (and AL Central) players showcase a somewhat less dramatic design. Just one player for you to digest on these cards. But a lot of sideways type. Who doesn't love reading tiny type sideways! Hey, 1990s, why didn't they change the words on every road sign and menu to sideways type? Yes, because there would be accidents and no one could feed themselves! Don't write north and south!



#64 - Lou Whitaker, Tigers

Finally, a star has broken through this pack. Sweet Lou is having his entire left arm X-rayed.



#347 - Joey Eischen, Expos

Uh, back to the NL East and pitching inside a volcano. Also, to what do I owe the unexpected delight of so many nameless relievers in this pack?



#320 - Tony Tarasco, Braves

Run, Tony! The bacteria will get you!



#527 - Kevin Ritz, Rockies

This is the design (why oh why are there so many designs, why oh why did MLB expand to six divisions?) that I know the best because all the Dodgers appear on this design.

It's not as colorful as the others. But it does feature a world-record-breaking six or seven or eight different versions of the same player in the same pose on each card. Kind of impressive in a drug-impaired-vision kinda way.



#542 - Gary Ingram, Dodgers

It's 1 in the afternoon. Plenty of daylight. And still I feel like I need to turn on every light in the house to read this thing.



#580 - Bryan Hickerson, Giants

I'm just now realizing that with this design, the player's name is printed in gold foil and is also listed in color near the top. And my eyes really need a rest.



#556 - Andy Benes, Padres

Sideways type is not any easier to read when written in cursive.



#517 - Marvin Freeman, Rockies

Marvin Freeman appears to be horrified that he's inside this card set.



#535 - Brett Butler, Dodgers

Just a mess.

Mercifully, we are at the end.

So that was my first 1995 Fleer pack break. It is not a lovely set to look at when you're pulling all the cards out of a pack with the designs overloading your senses. I can't imagine what this looks like in a binder. It has to be giving someone devastating flashbacks.

And that brings up another question: Has anyone ever completed this set? Will anyone ever admit to it?

Peter?

25 comments:

  1. Man, I forgot how much I liked 1995 Fleer! I know that football had a similar look and I think there were hockey and basketball sets as well. I may need to look into putting these sets together!

    -kin
    beansballcardblog.com
    ifeellikeacollectoragain.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I kind of want to put a couple pages together featuring one sample of each design across all the sports (I'm assuming football and basketball did the same different design per division thing) for the full WTFness of it all.

      Delete
    2. Oh damn 94-95 Fleer Hockey is also like this.

      Delete
    3. It is...I was bidding on a box on eBay but was outside twice...so wait I shall. I suspect shill bidding.

      Delete
  2. ooooooooooooooo, i'm mesmerized. is this a cult? i wanna join.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm drinking warm ginger tea, and chewing on some ginger root, trying not to vomit. I'm also clearing my computer's cache for the last hour. I'm also thinking about joining the cult. Now I'm going to my local Urgent Care.

    ReplyDelete
  4. When some Japanese kid with an iPhone makes a movie called "The Island of Baseball Card Horrors", this set will be thanked in the credits. I totally need a box of this.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Of the four sports Fleer put out with this design only hockey looked good

    ReplyDelete
  6. I haven't completed this set yet, but the last 10 cards are enroute to me from cardbarrel as I type this comment. I still need 15 for the update set. LOL. This isn't a set I need to look at once it is in the binder!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I wanted to be part of the half of your viewing audience that stayed. My curiosity got the best of me. They are actually a little more modern looking than I expected for 90's cards. I think they fit right in with the most recent cards.




    ReplyDelete
  8. Coming off of the labor thingie of 1994, EVERY card company tried waaaaay waaaaay too hard in 1995... but Fleer gets a medal for having the most "waaaaaaays" in front of their "hard". I'd never opened a pack of this before, so I find it interesting that the cards in the pack are grouped by the particular eyesore - I mean *division*.

    You inspired me to go back and check out the 21 Mets cards I have from this set, and I was reminded of how comparatively attractive the backs are... at least for the NL East cards. I don't know if the other divisions have different backs.

    ReplyDelete
  9. For years I couldn't stand the 1991 Fleer design... but I eventually grew to appreciate it. That's not going to happen with this product. It's over the top ugly.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The hell is that stuff? Baseball was way off my radar in 1995 and it looks like I was doing it right.

    ReplyDelete
  11. um....i have the master set of 1995 fleer (now split between two states, but still collected them all). i tend to get unhealthy obsessions with sets, and this was the one in 1995. i got a hot pack with all insert cards and it hooked me. inserts are the bomb (that '90s expression never left the vernacular, right?)

    ReplyDelete
  12. I feel like that's the worst pack you possibly could have gotten. (Side note: Wouldn't mind that Pete Schourek card though).

    ReplyDelete
  13. That is one really, really, REALLY weird set. For a long time I never realized how strange it was because I had only 1 card and it was from one of the designs that was actually kind of conventional.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I have to confess, I have this complete set and the update set. Bought some boxes in the mid 2000s and put it together myself. Yes it is painful on the eyes and yes I have a set collecting problem.

    ReplyDelete
  15. It's like staring into the sun but I don't want to close my eyes!

    ReplyDelete
  16. I don't understand the 1991 Fleer hate when compared to this set...

    ReplyDelete
  17. If you had a stack of these cards that got bricked together from the heat and humidity of your attic, you probably wouldn't try to un-brick them.

    ReplyDelete
  18. You can't stop the 90s, you can only hope to contain them!

    ReplyDelete
  19. I think I sort of just now noticed that the NL East background photos are different.

    ReplyDelete