Skip to main content

A surprise inside

If you do not have a Twitter account, I do not blame you one bit. Twitter, to put it quite bluntly, is the biggest shit show I have ever joined.

I am sure there are people who have signed up to Twitter because it's such a mess. In fact, I know there are. And that right there explains the mind-set of Twitter. It is a continuously updated series of disasters and overreactions, from people who love to wallow in disasters and overreactions, dialed up to two thousand and splattered in your face in a fit of pent-up aggression. Think of the most annoying student you knew in college. Now think of that same student with all of his or her neuroses, personal agendas and self-absorbed political thoughts belligerently aired for everyone to hear, just blaring from the student union, almost around the clock, and dammit, you'd better agree. That's Twitter much of the time.

Twitter is even more dysfunctional these days because the political takes are just relentless (as it is on any social media outlet). There are times when I wonder why I haven't seen a post or tweet from a certain person in weeks or months -- are they still alive? -- and then I realize I have blocked all of their political posts or words, leaving them with nothing else to say.

Gee, am I underselling Twitter a bit?

I guess I am.

There must be a reason I'm still there. Why am I still there?

I'm there for the baseball and the baseball cards. My job depends on staying on top of sports news in general and Twitter remains a great source of information (granted, in many cases you have to weed through several sports writers/bloggers politicized opinions to get to that info). No one really can compete with Twitter in this department.

My collection also depends on the sports card information available. This is the place where I find out about new product (and all of the cards I will never pull), as well as lots of good info on past sets and cards that I rarely come across on the blogs.

And Twitter remains a place where I can communicate with like-minded card folks. Amid all of the chaos and screaming and people running around with their hair on fire, believe it or not, you can enjoy a quiet, short convo about cards while the Chicken Littles throw themselves off an eight-story building in the background.

There are actually some people on Twitter who grew up at the same time that I did, who have an interest in the same period of cards that I do, and a number of those people don't write blogs. They like my tweets because they understand where I am coming from, and I appreciate that. (I tweet about cards and baseball and my memories of both, and that's about it. I have no interest in bothering anyone about anything else on Twitter).

One of those folks with which I've formed a Twitter bond is a guy who goes by @selectospeed. Just the other day we were reminiscing about the iron-on patches that our moms put on the holes in our Toughskins jeans. These are the conversations I enjoy.

A couple of weeks ago, @selectospeed asked if I wanted a card he pulled from 2017 Topps:

It's really impolite to say "Gimme" -- even on Twitter -- but I believe I said something very similar. Joc Pederson's Modern Ballplayer Signature aside, what a terrific card. The blue Father's Day motif, the blue Dodgers letters (they're Panini-esque), the knowledge that Pederson's dad, Stu, played in the Dodgers organization and was a noted player in Syracuse back in the day -- this is not only my first autographed card of the 2017 collecting season, but it might be my favorite 10 months from now.

But @selectospeed didn't stop there and sent a small variety of cards that I didn't expect.

 A few random Dodgers goodies. Much appreciated.

A starter set of 1983 Fleer Dodgers. The '83 Fleer set is one of those I may collect some day (unless I see another card show with the entire set available cheaply like I did last September). These will all go toward that down-the-line cause.


Here are some totally arbitrary but totally cool items (P.S.: the Bumgarner has already been distributed, selecto!)

And a very smoking 1962 Post card that I needed.

All of those terrific and they will be lovingly cataloged and stored.

But let's get to the surprise inside.

Ain't that cool?

This is a 1963 Fleer card of Don Drysdale, not the easiest card to obtain. (But easier than a couple of his teammates in this set, named Koufax and Wills).

As much as I like the autographed Joc card, it can't compare to the vintage Drysdale.

And this is what I can still get out of Twitter, people who admire the history of the hobby and appreciate fellow collectors' interests.

Early rant aside, there is the flip side of Twitter. It has many good points, including the baseball and card information I mentioned above. There is an enthusiasm for the hobby on there that sometimes I don't see on the blogs. Although I much prefer the reserved personality of the blogs, sometimes Twitter provides a more visible sign of appreciation for some of the posts I write and daily confirmation of this love for the hobby. If you are excited about a card that you just acquired, there is always someone on Twitter who knows how you feel and lets you know. That doesn't always happen on the blogs.

So, this is why I press on with Twitter. I often must put on my blinders and selective hearing before I engage with my fellow collecting buddies. But actually, I can have an enjoyable time with anyone who likes cards or enjoys baseball, especially from the '70s and '80s, regardless of their state of mind about anything else.

I suppose I can't expect everyone to think like me or act like me. But my mom not only ironed on patches on my jeans but she raised me with some manners that I try to follow, even online (as this post shows, sometimes I fail). I instinctively expect others to follow them, too. My mom could whip that Twitter into shape.


  1. I love the Fleer, both 1963 and 1983, and the Post Roseboro is awesome, but that's not why I'm commenting.

    Over the past few months, I've been idling pondering whether it would be worthwhile for me to get on Twitter. Aside from not knowing whether I'd have anything to tweet beyond "Hey, I've got a post up today!", I also feared the dysfunctional poopstorm you talk about at the beginning. The other part, the nice part, seems worthwhile, even if I just end up lurking in the background.

    At any rate, it's given me more to think about, and that's always a good thing from a post.

    1. ...and if I do get on Twitter, I promise I will follow @nightowlcards.

  2. I cant deal with Twitter (or Facebook) for all the reasons you described. I get all the social media interaction I need on Blogger... but its nice to know that there are some sane, civil people out there who Tweet about baseball and cards and iron on patches and stuff.

    The Drysdale card is awesome, btw.

  3. and I thought the surprise was that gorgeous framed Altuve (although Drysdale is a rather nice find.) Eh, what do I know? I'm twitless.

  4. Love the Drysdale. No doubt it's one of the best cards in that set.

  5. I'm with you on Twitter. I maintain an account but I basically only post links to my blogs on it. The main draw of Twitter for me is that is where the athletes post...sure, some occasionally do Facebook, but not many. And now last week I tried to change my profile picture on Twitter and it wouldn't let me, it put a boring white square in it's place. I've tried several times to fix it but no luck.

  6. There are free cards to be had on Twitter? I knew I was using it incorrectly. Speaking of free cards... that 83F Scioscia is fantastic! That's what a baseball card should look like (to me at least).

  7. I'm not on Twitter, and every time I think about trying it I see some of the crap that goes on and figure it isn't worth it. I'm glad that you find other collectors that make it worthwhile.

    It looks like the card show will be in Syracuse in mid-March. Maybe I'll have to check my schedule so that I can try to fly in or out of Syracuse when I go see my mom in March. Would you be up to seeing if the set is still available cheap?

    1. March is the busiest month of the year at my job, but if I get a date I can see if it's doable. The Fairgrounds show is April 9th and I've got that date circled.

  8. I go to Twitter every now and then but I have a tendency toward addiction and it's hard to know when to stop. It's cool when you find guys like Steve Martin and Carl Reiner there. Awesome group of cards.

  9. Agree with you on n Twitter. If you stay away from the political stuff there is plenty of good card/baseball/sports dialogue that is good.

  10. He went there, the Toughskin "jeans" from Sears and iron on patches in the knees. As for Twitter I have a tendency to avoid it. I occasionally check it out when I get those "see what's happening in the world" emails from them. My problem with it has always been the 140 character limit. That and when someone you are following goes an a Twitter binge for 50+ posts and all you see on your feed is that person going on and on about some boring thing that makes you wonder why you started following them in the first place. I follow some card collectors on Twitter but like on Facebook I have not made any trades on those venues. For me they don't seem like a card trading source, I use them for other purposes.

  11. Twitter for me is cards, and sports. Nothing else.

    Any news updates or crap like that gets ignored...

  12. I finally signed up for Twitter. Though, contra you, I am only on there to follow the political shit show taking place right now. I am fairly selective in who I follow.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Addressing the elephant in the room

A few people have noticed: I changed the way the blog looked with zero fanfare earlier this week.

I've changed my blog appearance, I think, six times now, although one was just a header swap. Just about all of those came with a bit of a warning or explanation.

I didn't think that was necessary this time, mostly because I've been doing this for over a decade, am pretty established, and don't think I need to justify my decisions here.

But also I thought that people were familiar with the general changes in web sites over the last two, three, four years and wouldn't be that affected by it. For the most part that seems to be true -- or, no one cares and they're all looking at pretty instagram pictures.

I've received a couple of questions though and just because I hate the feeling that some readers are lost, I'll explain what I can.

The changes, like many web site changes, are related to mobile phone use.

I've been irked by the way my blog looks on my p…

Mind explosion: a different way to sort

This may have been one of the most tedious blog posts to put together in the history of this blog, but I think it's for a good cause.

The reason I'm not entirely sure is because I didn't have time to carry it out for a few more attempts, got to shovel that 7 inches of heavy wet snow plopped on my estate on Nov. 12th.

Anyway, a couple of days ago, Colbey from Cardboard Collections was sorting his Topps Holiday set by card number and asked a very common question that I've seen come up many times during my blogging career:

 This is always a satisfying question because this is how I organize my sets when I'm organizing by card number. At the top of the post I showed cards from the 2019 Topps flagship set being sorted in that manner -- stacks separated by hundreds first, then you create separate stacks by 10s within each hundreds stack, then finally order each of the 10s by card number.

I've done this since I was a kid and first knew the card numbers on the back me…

Looking at cards with Johnny B.

Over the weekend, I got a chance to express my inner Mike Oz and share some baseball cards with a former major league player.

I'm working on a story for my paper that involves ex-player Johnny Wockenfuss, who is almost a cult figure with fans of a certain age (I am one) and especially fans of the Detroit Tigers during the '70s and '80s.

I won't go into much detail -- at least not now -- because I'm still in the middle of working on it, have more gathering to go, and I get very protective of my stories while I'm in the middle of the process. Got to retain that exclusive, you know.

But I will say that I was able to sit in the home of Wockenfuss, give him the cards that I have of him in my collection, and ask his opinion on them.

Yeah, cool. Way cool.

I have 17 cards of Wockenfuss ("you have a lot of them," my wife said, and I thought "if that's a lot, what is my Hideo Nomo collection?"). Wockenfuss remembered the cards -- "every bit …