Skip to main content

What Porky Pig said


Later tonight I will kick off the Traded set portion of the 1985 Topps set over on my 1985 Topps blog.

After completing the 792-card flagship set the other day I realized that I've now written three set blogs from start to finish, with the 1975 Topps set first, followed by the 1971 Topps set and now the 1985 Topps set. I don't think anyone has done that before.

That would impress a few people back when blogs were king and set-blogging was fashionable. Nobody cares much anymore, or a lot less people do anyway.

That's not the reason why I'm going to stop doing set blogs once the '85 Traded set is done though. I'm just tired of running multiple blogs. I've been doing that for more than eight years now and it's time to move on to other interests.

Night Owl Cards isn't going anywhere, don't you worry. The need to write remains strong.

There is always the slight possibility that after I've wrapped up the '85 set and I'm working on one blog and one blog alone that I'll get the itch to do another set blog. I don't think that'll happen but who knows.

If that happens, there are two ways I could go: 1993 Upper Deck or 1981 Topps.

The '93 UD set is a no-brainer. But I've always felt a little sorry for the '81 Topps set. It is just about the only Topps flagship set from that sweet spot (say 1960s to the early 1990s) that has not been covered in set-blog form. Even those set blogs that got maybe 100 or 200 cards into the set before giving up the blog haven't bothered with '81 Topps.

So, I think '81 Topps deserves some chronicling.

I'd much rather it be chronicled by someone else though.

Because right now it's three-and-out for me.

Comments

  1. Congrats on the card blog hat trick! Being one of those people who only got through a couple hundred cards in a blog (for those who don't know, I used to have a 1982 Topps blog back around the turn of the decade), I know how time consuming it is. I couldn't find time to keep it up after 2 or 3 years. Impressive! Glad you're keepin' on with this blog. I don't know what I'd do without it.... find some other card blog to follow? I have no idea if there are any good ones left out there. It's been a while since I looked.

    '81 Topps would be cool. I'm not really familiar with the set. It was the set from the year before I started card collecting, so I saw some of the cards here & there and thought they were pretty unique (loved the hat). 90's cards feel too overproduced to me, so I never really bothered with 'em.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I know all about multiple blog attempts. At least you followed through and finished yours. I left way too many hanging

    ReplyDelete
  3. Here here! Thanks for huge package!

    ReplyDelete
  4. http://toppscardsthatneverwere.blogspot.com/p/1985-topps-reference-page.html Not all of these missing cards have been made yet, but this should keep the ‘85 Topps blog alive for a while.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Count me among those that find it quite impressive that you've finished three. I admire things that I cannot do.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I would love to see the 1993 Upper Deck set blogged.

    ReplyDelete
  7. That's really cool that you wrapped up your third set blog. A few years ago, I considered starting a blog to honor the 1981 Fleer set. It has a lot of sentimental meaning for me and provided a lot of enjoyment for me when I was a kid. But it's hard enough to run one blog... let alone two at a time. One of these days... maybe.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Have you made your decision on this? I'm thinking about doing something new on my blog. How about I do 1981 Topps on my blog (within Baseball Cards Come to Life, not as a separate blog) and you do your 1993 UD blog?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Addressing the elephant in the room

A few people have noticed: I changed the way the blog looked with zero fanfare earlier this week.

I've changed my blog appearance, I think, six times now, although one was just a header swap. Just about all of those came with a bit of a warning or explanation.

I didn't think that was necessary this time, mostly because I've been doing this for over a decade, am pretty established, and don't think I need to justify my decisions here.

But also I thought that people were familiar with the general changes in web sites over the last two, three, four years and wouldn't be that affected by it. For the most part that seems to be true -- or, no one cares and they're all looking at pretty instagram pictures.

I've received a couple of questions though and just because I hate the feeling that some readers are lost, I'll explain what I can.

The changes, like many web site changes, are related to mobile phone use.

I've been irked by the way my blog looks on my p…

Mind explosion: a different way to sort

This may have been one of the most tedious blog posts to put together in the history of this blog, but I think it's for a good cause.

The reason I'm not entirely sure is because I didn't have time to carry it out for a few more attempts, got to shovel that 7 inches of heavy wet snow plopped on my estate on Nov. 12th.

Anyway, a couple of days ago, Colbey from Cardboard Collections was sorting his Topps Holiday set by card number and asked a very common question that I've seen come up many times during my blogging career:


 This is always a satisfying question because this is how I organize my sets when I'm organizing by card number. At the top of the post I showed cards from the 2019 Topps flagship set being sorted in that manner -- stacks separated by hundreds first, then you create separate stacks by 10s within each hundreds stack, then finally order each of the 10s by card number.

I've done this since I was a kid and first knew the card numbers on the back me…

Looking at cards with Johnny B.

Over the weekend, I got a chance to express my inner Mike Oz and share some baseball cards with a former major league player.

I'm working on a story for my paper that involves ex-player Johnny Wockenfuss, who is almost a cult figure with fans of a certain age (I am one) and especially fans of the Detroit Tigers during the '70s and '80s.

I won't go into much detail -- at least not now -- because I'm still in the middle of working on it, have more gathering to go, and I get very protective of my stories while I'm in the middle of the process. Got to retain that exclusive, you know.

But I will say that I was able to sit in the home of Wockenfuss, give him the cards that I have of him in my collection, and ask his opinion on them.

Yeah, cool. Way cool.

I have 17 cards of Wockenfuss ("you have a lot of them," my wife said, and I thought "if that's a lot, what is my Hideo Nomo collection?"). Wockenfuss remembered the cards -- "every bit …