Skip to main content

This is the 2018 Topps National League team set


While I was out getting some cards at Rite Aid yesterday, I also swung by Target and purchased Topps' National League team set that it puts out every year.

There is almost no point to this set -- and the accompanying American League team set -- and it's getting more and more pointless by the year. The only thing that made it stand out each year was the placement of the NL or AL logo on each card so you could distinguish it from the flagship card with the same photo.

Well, there's no NL or AL logo this year. Apparently there wasn't one last year either (I didn't bother getting the set). So to separate these cards in your brain from the other cards that look almost exactly the same, you'll have to turn the card over and check out the card number.

This may seem like a trivial topic for a blog post, but it gets a bit frustrating deciphering the cards available these days. Topps doesn't exactly go to acceptable lengths to get the word out. A couple of weeks ago, I actually confused the AL and NL team sets hanging in my local Target with the "other" team sets, the individual team team sets. I thought I was looking at the Yankees and Nationals team sets, because -- again -- no AL or NL logo.

Then one of those lovely online people who only emerges when it's time to correct someone set me straight. Such an attractive quality, online person. But the point is, it seems like nobody is providing information unless they get to tell someone they're wrong!

I know that's not entirely true. My apologies to Ryan Cracknell and the like, but there just isn't enough information out there about cards sometimes.

So let me give you the obsessive, totally unnecessary lowdown on the 2018 Topps NL team set.


NL-1 - Bryce Harper, Nationals

Have we seen this image before?: Yes, it's Harper's Opening Day photo. Expect to see this in Series 2.



NL-10 - Michael Conforto, Mets

(That's right, "NL-10," I'll get to that).

Have we seen this image before?: Yes, it's Conforto's flagship photo.



NL-3 - Charlie Blackmon, Rockies

Have we seen this image before?: Yes, it's Blackmon's Opening Day photo.



NL-8 - Stephen Strasburg, Nationals

Have we seen this image before?: Yup. It's Strasburg's flagship photo.



NL-15 - Justin Turner, Dodgers

Have we seen this image before?: Yup. Opening Day.



NL-12 - Yadier Molina, Cardinals

Have we seen this image before?: Yes. Opening Day.



NL-5 - Daniel Murphy, Nationals

Have we seen this image before?: Yes, Opening Day. It's a different image than his flagship card, which is always nice.



NL-14 - Joey Votto, Reds

Have we seen this image before?: Yes. Opening Day.



NL-7 - Clayton Kershaw, Dodgers

Have we seen this image before?: It's his Opening Day photo, which is different from his flagship photo.



NL-9 - DJ LeMahieu, Rockies

Have we seen this image before?: Opening Day.



NL-4 - Buster Posey, Giants

Have we seen this image before?: Flagship.



NL-13 - Corey Seager, Dodgers

Have we seen this image before?: Opening Day



NL-2 - Cody Bellinger, Dodgers

Have we seen this image before?: Flagship



NL-16 - Max Scherzer, Nationals

Have we seen this image before?: Opening Day



NL-6 - Ryan Zimmerman, Nationals

Have we seen this image before?: Flagship



NL-11 - Paul Goldschmidt, Diamondbacks

Have we seen this image before?: Opening Day



NL-17 - Nolan Arenado, Rockies

Have we seen this image before?: Flagship


That's the whole team set. It's 17 cards. I showed the cards in order of how they came out of the package. Only cards 1, 3 and 17 were in order. Everything else was scattered throughout.

This set has a "we'll put in whatever players we want to and call it a 'team set'" feel to it, which I'm sure is the way these NL team sets have always been. Outside of every player being named an NL All-Star last year there is no other connection. I believe these were called "all-star team sets" before, I wish they'd go back to that. And back to putting the league logos on the cards.

Outside of getting the Dodgers in this set, because I have the addiction, there is absolutely no reason for me to buy this or for it to be made.

The only reason I can think of why it's made is this:

I actually went to Target to get the American League team set, so I could send the Aaron Judge card to Sports Card Collectors. But the AL team set was sold out, probably because Judge was the first card showing and I live in Yankee land.

So that's the reason why the AL team sets are there: for impulse buyers, some of whom may have no idea what they're buying.

But maybe someone will see this post and figure out what's going on. Someone's got to tell people.

Comments

  1. Wait, so Topps is being vague in an effort to confuse unsuspecting buyers into spending money on product that is essentially the same as what they already bought?

    Say it ain't so! ��

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for sharing these... Now I know to skip on by these

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow, there is no rhyme or reason to the player selection of this set. What kind of All-Star roster would have 4 players listed as first basemen and only 3 outfielders? Yikes!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Base set, team set, chrome set, opening day set, holiday snowflake set, now this. How many times do they make the same damn card over and over again? That's not even including parallels.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is the innovation and creativity that was promised when the exclusive licenses happened. Aren't we all happy???

    ReplyDelete
  6. As an oddball guy... I'd probably grab the AL set for the Altuve. I recently purchased the Angels team set. It was an affordable way to add an Ohtani oddball rookie for my collection.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The lists have been right here for months! https://www.beckett.com/news/2018-topps-baseball-team-sets-checklists/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I believe I mentioned you in the post. The intent was to focus on Topps' inability to inform consumers.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Addressing the elephant in the room

A few people have noticed: I changed the way the blog looked with zero fanfare earlier this week.

I've changed my blog appearance, I think, six times now, although one was just a header swap. Just about all of those came with a bit of a warning or explanation.

I didn't think that was necessary this time, mostly because I've been doing this for over a decade, am pretty established, and don't think I need to justify my decisions here.

But also I thought that people were familiar with the general changes in web sites over the last two, three, four years and wouldn't be that affected by it. For the most part that seems to be true -- or, no one cares and they're all looking at pretty instagram pictures.

I've received a couple of questions though and just because I hate the feeling that some readers are lost, I'll explain what I can.

The changes, like many web site changes, are related to mobile phone use.

I've been irked by the way my blog looks on my p…

Mind explosion: a different way to sort

This may have been one of the most tedious blog posts to put together in the history of this blog, but I think it's for a good cause.

The reason I'm not entirely sure is because I didn't have time to carry it out for a few more attempts, got to shovel that 7 inches of heavy wet snow plopped on my estate on Nov. 12th.

Anyway, a couple of days ago, Colbey from Cardboard Collections was sorting his Topps Holiday set by card number and asked a very common question that I've seen come up many times during my blogging career:


 This is always a satisfying question because this is how I organize my sets when I'm organizing by card number. At the top of the post I showed cards from the 2019 Topps flagship set being sorted in that manner -- stacks separated by hundreds first, then you create separate stacks by 10s within each hundreds stack, then finally order each of the 10s by card number.

I've done this since I was a kid and first knew the card numbers on the back me…

Looking at cards with Johnny B.

Over the weekend, I got a chance to express my inner Mike Oz and share some baseball cards with a former major league player.

I'm working on a story for my paper that involves ex-player Johnny Wockenfuss, who is almost a cult figure with fans of a certain age (I am one) and especially fans of the Detroit Tigers during the '70s and '80s.

I won't go into much detail -- at least not now -- because I'm still in the middle of working on it, have more gathering to go, and I get very protective of my stories while I'm in the middle of the process. Got to retain that exclusive, you know.

But I will say that I was able to sit in the home of Wockenfuss, give him the cards that I have of him in my collection, and ask his opinion on them.

Yeah, cool. Way cool.

I have 17 cards of Wockenfuss ("you have a lot of them," my wife said, and I thought "if that's a lot, what is my Hideo Nomo collection?"). Wockenfuss remembered the cards -- "every bit …