Skip to main content

Maybe I should move south


I received an email a few weeks ago from Chunter of Chipp 'n' Dale informing me that he had obtained some 1975 Topps minis in a trade with his card shop dealer.

The price for those '75 minis? Apparently a single parallel card of Braves closer Craig Kimbrel.

Holy smokes.

If it wasn't for NASCAR, college football and prehistoric insects, I think I'd move south tomorrow. I'd love to get rid of needless Braves for cards of real value.

Chunter then sent those very valuable '75 minis my way. And these weren't just any '75 minis, as you will see. There were some significant ones there.

But we'll start slowly. Mini alongside the regular-size card in my collection for comparison:


#582 - Eduardo Rodriguez



#132 - Randy Moffitt



#649 - Jack Heidemann

One of the few '75 cards I now have in regular, mini and O-Pee-Chee versions.



#282 - Jerry Morales



#326 - Wayne Twitchell

This will tell you what age I was when I first collected these cards. I still associate Wayne Twitchell with Big Bird.



#207 - 1969 MVPs


And now moving on to some heavy hitters:


#255 - Dwight Evans

Mini Evans has lost his corners



#29 - Dave Parker



#104 - Bill Madlock



#530 - Gaylord Perry



#284 - Ken Griffey



#90 - Rusty Staub



#370 - Tom Seaver



#61 - Dave Winfield


So, all of that for a few coins and a Kimbrel parallel.

I've got a vacation coming up. Maybe I'll look up plane ticket prices to Atlanta.

Most of the cards above are in ideal shape. In fact, if the folks who have sent me '75 minis hadn't done such a great job of finding wonderfully conditioned cards, I wouldn't give a thought to someday replacing any of them.

I mean, look at the Rick Auerbach card at the top. That thing looks exactly like the '75 minis that I collected in '75 -- wonderfully handled and worn, but not butchered with creases, tears or pen marks.

Still, I'll likely try to upgrade Winfield, Evans and possibly Seaver. But there's no urgency there. I'm just happy that I'm even closer to completing the '75 mini set.

And I'm happy all that was lost in the exchange was a Braves card (and a few Braves I'll be sending Chunter in return).

What a steal.

Comments

  1. I never thought Ken Griffey, Jr. looked like his dad until I saw that 75 mini. Did a double take.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wow! That's a great bunch of cards.. You gotta be pretty close now

    ReplyDelete
  3. Glad you liked the cards! Maybe I should move north - I bet I could find some Yankees to give up for some low priced Braves.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Addressing the elephant in the room

A few people have noticed: I changed the way the blog looked with zero fanfare earlier this week.

I've changed my blog appearance, I think, six times now, although one was just a header swap. Just about all of those came with a bit of a warning or explanation.

I didn't think that was necessary this time, mostly because I've been doing this for over a decade, am pretty established, and don't think I need to justify my decisions here.

But also I thought that people were familiar with the general changes in web sites over the last two, three, four years and wouldn't be that affected by it. For the most part that seems to be true -- or, no one cares and they're all looking at pretty instagram pictures.

I've received a couple of questions though and just because I hate the feeling that some readers are lost, I'll explain what I can.

The changes, like many web site changes, are related to mobile phone use.

I've been irked by the way my blog looks on my p…

Not done with baseball but so done with 2019 baseball cards

I stayed true to my vow to avoid viewing most of the League Championship Series. After the NLDS debacle, my heart wasn't in another round of baseball.

I did sit down for a little bit of Game 4 of the Nats-Cards and, of course, I had to watch the highlights of Game 6 of the Astros-Yankees.

But that was about it, and I placed a "TBD" on the World Series, too. "We'll see how I feel," I said.

Well, the World Series starts tomorrow and I fully plan to watch it -- at least the portions that do not air when I am at work. I've decided that I'm just not done with baseball yet. The Astros-Nationals appeals to me a bit just because of all the fantastic starting pitching matchups. So, baseball, you're off the hook. I'll still watch you.

Your trading card sets, however ...

That's another matter.

I'm finished with buying 2019 cards. I knew that a few weeks ago, probably a few months ago. But it hit home when I was opening the five loose packs of …

Mind explosion: a different way to sort

This may have been one of the most tedious blog posts to put together in the history of this blog, but I think it's for a good cause.

The reason I'm not entirely sure is because I didn't have time to carry it out for a few more attempts, got to shovel that 7 inches of heavy wet snow plopped on my estate on Nov. 12th.

Anyway, a couple of days ago, Colbey from Cardboard Collections was sorting his Topps Holiday set by card number and asked a very common question that I've seen come up many times during my blogging career:


 This is always a satisfying question because this is how I organize my sets when I'm organizing by card number. At the top of the post I showed cards from the 2019 Topps flagship set being sorted in that manner -- stacks separated by hundreds first, then you create separate stacks by 10s within each hundreds stack, then finally order each of the 10s by card number.

I've done this since I was a kid and first knew the card numbers on the back me…