Monday, February 18, 2013

Parallel-o-grams


You're scared.

You think I'm going to start talking about math, aren't you?

Come out from under that table.

No, silly, I'm not talking about THAT kind of parallelogram.

I'm talking about "parallel-o-grams!"

Parallels that come in the mail!

Cards like this:


I'm sure folks have noticed how easy it is to accumulate parallels in 2013 Topps.

I have managed to land these three Kershaws not even a month into the set's release, and I still don't have the Walmart or Target parallel of Kershaw's 2012 Topps card.

I'm sure the reason for this is that there are more parallels per pack this year than previous years. I suppose this is "bad" for the market-watchers, people who sell cards or care about "scarcity" and all that yaaawwwwwwwnnnnn!

But all I know is I have been scrambling around trying to get as many Dodger parallels as I can and it's been great fun! If Topps is going to up the count on its parallels, this was a good year to do it. Someone like me who loves crazy contrasting colors (think 1975 Topps) can't get enough of the border color bouncing off the diamond design color. Blue with orange? Red with green? Green with orange? Yes! The louder the better. You don't like it? Send them to me.

And people have.


This terrific green ... I mean "emerald" ... parallel arrived from 2 by 3 Heroes. I had to have it. Now I has it.


Here is "nowhere man" Dee Gordon all shiny and emerald, retiring someone appropriately named "Moss" since there appears to be moss growing all over this card.

Gordon arrived from Community Gum, who couldn't resist adding another parallel:


The terrific landscape Ted Lilly Target card.


It goes nicely with the Walmart blue Lilly that I pulled a few days ago when I grabbed a rack pack with the 5 dollars I cobbled together through saving a week-and-a-half of coins. (lately I've been having flashbacks to being 8 years old and counting allowance money).


Community Gum also sent a couple of inserts, but I'm not talking about inserts today. Yes, I know these inserts have their own parallels, but those are evil parallels. Best avoided. Or shot down with lasers.


No, today I'm talking about fantastically colorful parallels!!!!

This great Gonzalez parallel arrived from Steve E.

Some of you who aren't on Twitter may not know Steve E. But faithful blog readers will remember him as the one who sent me my 1971 Topps Thurman Munson card in one of the odder trades I have ever made.

Through all of this parallel transacting I have yet to turn up a gold-paralleled Dodger (although a gold Kershaw has just been spotted and saved for me. Phew!).

No matter. I'd rather have the colors anyway.

I know that several collectors dismiss parallels as not their thing. But when you're not collecting the set the traditional way, parallels give you something fun to find that's "new," and I'm sure Topps knows this.

Through spending little money on packs, I've already surpassed the number of Dodger parallels I accumulated from 2012 Topps. That's a tribute to my enthusiasm but mostly a factor of Topps making them more plentiful.

Even with all this 2013 parallel-chasing, I still haven't forgotten my vintage vow.

There was another card that came from Steve E. with the A-Gone red card.


That's a 1955 Bowman Gil Hodges, of course.

I love the aged look. It reminds me of the TV my folks had in the early '70s when I was just a youngster. Scuffing and everything. Except for the creases, of course. It's quite difficult to crease one of those old wooden television sets.

Now that ... THAT is a parallelogram.

10 comments:

  1. Keep on yawning, I'll keep flipping catastrophically ugly Manny Machado red parallels for the price of a pair of rack packs.

    PS. I have an AJ Ellis purple, maybe some more goodies.

    ReplyDelete
  2. NICE on '55 Bowman Gil!

    (I will confess to skimming this post until I got there, though. I'm a bad reader.)

    ReplyDelete
  3. @Roy-Z ~ Hearing about people selling cards bores me. I can't help it. ... I already have AJ purple.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Q: Do you know why parallel lines never meet?

    A: Because no one takes the time to introduce them.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think this year's Topps parallels are the best we've seen from the hobby in years.

    Love the '55 Hodges as well. I'd actually been planning to do a '55 Bowman-involved post tonight. A happy coincidence, I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I was all excited by the math and then you had to multi-color-dodger-ify it all.

    I'm also traumatized by the fact you said you've depleted every ounce of my want list. So much so that I cannot bring myself to write a trade post. Please reconsider.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yes, another math teacher here. I was all excited until I saw multiple emerald, red, and blue parallels.
    Nice word play though!

    ReplyDelete
  8. So does

    Blue + red
    ____________ = 1/2 Rainbow ?

    Green + Purple

    ReplyDelete
  9. Nice! Keep those parallels coming! That is, if you haven't shown them all off yet. It would be pretty cool to have a team set in red, blue and emerald or even go the distance and get camo and pink on board!!!

    I haven't forgot that I'm sending you that Koufax gold chasing history parallel, I just wanted to see what else I could send over in the meantime.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Sorry, not a math teacher here. I broke out in a cold sweat when i saw that image on my blogroll...

    ReplyDelete