Skip to main content

Winners, winners everywhere

Did you know that Andy Messersmith was a Gold Glove-caliber fielder? I had no idea until a few moments ago.

I had read about the Dodgers placing two players on the National League Gold Glove team this year, and the article said it was the first time that the Dodgers had two players who had spent the entire year with the club on the Gold Glove team since 1975. I had Steve Garvey figured out right away as one of the slick fielders on that '75 team. But Messersmith came as a surprise. There is so much I don't know about that guy. Yet he's one of my favorite pitchers of the '70s.

But I have to say congratulations to the two players on this year's team:

Orlando Hudson, who is probably playing elsewhere next year.

And Matt Kemp, who has very few cards picturing him fielding. Fortunately, I have this Capewood's Collection card sent to me by Cliff.

Now, normally, I wouldn't care about the Gold Glove Awards, which is one of the emptiest awards of the postseason, often going to a player based on past performance or even offensive performance. But I don't expect the Dodgers to win any other postseason awards, so I'll celebrate the few winners that they have.

Speaking of winners, you may remember that I was holding a contest in celebration of my 700th post. And it's time to reveal the winner.

The key to winning was to answer the following question:

There are three friends in my childhood that were key card trading partners with me. What are their first names?

The more names you got correct, the better your chances of winning. And in case of a tie, I would use the always trusty randomizing method to determine a winner.

Well, we did have a tie.

For a long time, I didn't think there would be a tie. That's because so many entrants guessed one name correctly -- and it wasn't always the same name -- that I thought surely someone would guess at least two correctly. But I waited and waited and waited, and no one could put two of the names together. Over and over, someone would guess one of them but not the others.

Also, several folks went to my post that I wrote about my sixth-grade class and the trading partners I had there. One of the people in my class was indeed one of the answers. But the others weren't. The other two correct names were much more key to my trading development than those sixth graders. In other words, they came along before I hit sixth grade.

I gave you a couple of hints. One was a boy who I had mentioned several times before. The other was a girl that I had also mentioned briefly. The other was a boy who had a name that could also be a girl's name.

Here are the correct answers:

Mario, Jennifer and Jamie.

Twelve of you guessed at least one of those names. Six guessed Mario. Three guessed Jennifer (I allowed Jenny, although we never called her that). Three guessed Jamie.

So, that means 12 people tied for first place. Here are the 12:

1. deal
2. White Sox Cards
3. Roof God
4. zman
5. laf
6. opoohwan
7. SpastikMooss
8. shahekee
9. Anthony K.
10. madding
11. AdamE
12. Eric

So, I hit and randomized the names. And then I tried and tried and tried to get a screen capture of the results. But I'm computer inept, and could not get an image. You've never seen anyone press the command/shift/3 keys so many times. Trust me.

And that's what you're going to have to do when I reveal the results here, using my humble typing skills. I wrote down the randomized results generated by and then retyped them thusly:

1. zman
2. opoohwan
3. deal
4. Eric
5. White Sox Cards
6. AdamE
7. Anthony K.
8. shahekee
9. SpastikMooss
10. Roof God
11. laf
12. madding

And that means the winner is:


Congrats, Zach. You win the following two cards:
Plus, a few dollar bags of cards from the 1990s from my favorite dollar store, and a nice stack of players from your favorite team, which I know is the Royals. (You have no idea how glad I am that it's not the Mets or Indians).

Thanks everyone for playing. And congratulations again to Zach.

I'm sure I owe you some cards anyway.


  1. I thought I had something for sure with that Gina thing. Not even close hahaha.

  2. Sweet! I actualy had Jamie down, but I ended up going with Chris instead. Luckily, it worked out.

    Thanks Greg!


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Addressing the elephant in the room

A few people have noticed: I changed the way the blog looked with zero fanfare earlier this week.

I've changed my blog appearance, I think, six times now, although one was just a header swap. Just about all of those came with a bit of a warning or explanation.

I didn't think that was necessary this time, mostly because I've been doing this for over a decade, am pretty established, and don't think I need to justify my decisions here.

But also I thought that people were familiar with the general changes in web sites over the last two, three, four years and wouldn't be that affected by it. For the most part that seems to be true -- or, no one cares and they're all looking at pretty instagram pictures.

I've received a couple of questions though and just because I hate the feeling that some readers are lost, I'll explain what I can.

The changes, like many web site changes, are related to mobile phone use.

I've been irked by the way my blog looks on my p…

Mind explosion: a different way to sort

This may have been one of the most tedious blog posts to put together in the history of this blog, but I think it's for a good cause.

The reason I'm not entirely sure is because I didn't have time to carry it out for a few more attempts, got to shovel that 7 inches of heavy wet snow plopped on my estate on Nov. 12th.

Anyway, a couple of days ago, Colbey from Cardboard Collections was sorting his Topps Holiday set by card number and asked a very common question that I've seen come up many times during my blogging career:

 This is always a satisfying question because this is how I organize my sets when I'm organizing by card number. At the top of the post I showed cards from the 2019 Topps flagship set being sorted in that manner -- stacks separated by hundreds first, then you create separate stacks by 10s within each hundreds stack, then finally order each of the 10s by card number.

I've done this since I was a kid and first knew the card numbers on the back me…

Looking at cards with Johnny B.

Over the weekend, I got a chance to express my inner Mike Oz and share some baseball cards with a former major league player.

I'm working on a story for my paper that involves ex-player Johnny Wockenfuss, who is almost a cult figure with fans of a certain age (I am one) and especially fans of the Detroit Tigers during the '70s and '80s.

I won't go into much detail -- at least not now -- because I'm still in the middle of working on it, have more gathering to go, and I get very protective of my stories while I'm in the middle of the process. Got to retain that exclusive, you know.

But I will say that I was able to sit in the home of Wockenfuss, give him the cards that I have of him in my collection, and ask his opinion on them.

Yeah, cool. Way cool.

I have 17 cards of Wockenfuss ("you have a lot of them," my wife said, and I thought "if that's a lot, what is my Hideo Nomo collection?"). Wockenfuss remembered the cards -- "every bit …