Skip to main content

Diversity and Kellogg's baseball cards


Imagine pulling the likes of Fred Norman out of an insert set issued by Topps in 2020.

You can't. It would never happen.

Sure, Norman pitched for a World Series championship team the year before this card was issued, the 1976 Cincinnati Reds. He was the starter in Game 2 of the Series. But he was hardly a star. His stats were respectable but if anyone was going to mention pitching on the Reds -- and no one hardly did because the Big Red Machine operated at the plate, not the mound -- it would be Don Gullett or Jack Billingham.

But still Kellogg's placed Norman at card No. 8 in its 57-card set in 1977.



Another pitcher. Same set, same story.

Doug Rau was a solid thrower for the Dodgers. I thought he was underrated and didn't get enough attention. He was definitely No. 4, though, on a starting rotation list that consisted of Don Sutton, Tommy John and Burt Hooton. Some days, even No. 5 hurler Rick Rhoden surpassed him.

But do you see Sutton, John or Hooton in the 1977 Kellogg's set? Nope. You see Rau.

This is the charm and quirkiness of '70s Kellogg's sets.

Believe me, we thought it odd as we were collecting the cards at the time. Mario Guerrero? Wayne Nordhagen?


Tom Poquette?

When do you hear the name Tom Poquette today? Probably, unless you're a Royals fan from that time period or someone in baseball at the time, you don't know Tom Poquette. But he displayed a rookie cup on his 1977 Topps card and Kellogg's considered him one of the exclusive few for honor in the '77 Kellogg's set.

That's because Kellogg's made sure its set was diverse.

Here are some of the players you will not find in the '77 Kellogg's set, which is titled "3-D Super Stars," by the way:

Reggie Jackson, Carl Yastrzemski, Fred Lynn, Johnny Bench, Mike Schmidt, Joe Morgan, Jim Rice, Robin Yount, Nolan Ryan, Jim Palmer, Tom Seaver.

But you will find:


Ken Reitz, Andy Messersmith and Freddie Patek.

Some may scream false advertising. But Kellogg's didn't shy away from stars, as you will see in a minute. Yet, it wanted you to know that there were superstars in places where fans might necessarily look. Kellogg's didn't feature every team each year, but it did spread the love around. My just-completed '76 Kellogg's set does the same thing, mixing Steve Hargan and Eric Soderholm in with Willie Stargell and Steve Garvey.

That's a much more pleasing philosophy for a collector like me than the Beating A Dead Horse strategy Topps employs with every limited set. Each insert set must include the top rookies and chosen stars of the day. EVERY set. So if you're a fan of Bryce Harper or Shohei Otani or Vladimir Guerrero Jr., you're in luck. Expect to see your guy in every damn insert set and online set and special one-off series in your potato chip bag.

But what if you follow the Twins and want to see Jorge Polanco in several insert sets? Or the A's and Marcus Semien or the Diamondbacks and Ketel Marte? Sure, Topps will throw those guys a bone in one its expansive 100-card insert sets. But guaranteed, if Topps was running the Kellogg's 57-card-set-per-year show today, none of those "other" guys would make the set. It would be Acuna and Yelich and Bellinger.

Topps wouldn't dare leave any of those guys out.


Kellogg's did address the players who emerged with dramatically great seasons, Randy Jones and Wayne Garland each produced them in 1976. And it's not like Kellogg's didn't recognize the most talked-about rookies. Mark Fidrych is in the 1977 Kellogg's set.

But it mixed in a few other players who weren't the most talked about players even on their own team:


It was an opportunity to learn about these players that we didn't know as well and weren't on our televisions very often.

I know kids don't collect baseball cards en masse like they did when I was a kid, but I sometimes feel sorry for any kid who has been collecting the last 15 years or so. There is no Kellogg's to distribute the wealth, so instead collectors now own a three-foot pile of Albert Pujols and Derek Jeter cards whether they collect those players or not.

I think what Kellogg's said back in the '70s and early '80s was: recognize some of the stars that everyone knows ...

 

... but don't forget about some of those other stars who don't get the attention from the big markets.

All of the cards that I showed here are from my most recent pick up of 1977 Kellogg's cards. I am delighted with every single one. They were truly the Technological Card Marvels of their time and I cannot wait to get them stored.

I have 16 cards remaining to complete the set. The Fidrych one, of course, I anticipate being the last to get. Or maybe the George Foster, since it's the first card in the set.

But there are other cards on that want list of players that Topps would probably never put in a limited set today: guys like Jerry Remy and Dock Ellis and Charlie Hough.

Too bad.

Some card sets spread the wealth.

Some card companies care only about their own wealth.

Comments

I too miss the old days. The current releases feel very restrictive, which is probably why I don't buy packs and just end up with the 'current' cards years later when they end up in dime boxes.
GCA said…
Great post (and point)!

I'm always harping on Topps' limited imagination for insert concepts. But you hit the most critical aspect - it's the same guys all the time, even if it is a little more creative theme.

Once again, I bow to the master blogger.
Nick Vossbrink said…
While I definitely hate the 100-card Rookies and Stars checklists that so many sets consist of now I'm also amazed at how different these 1970s checklists are from the 1980s food issues. When I was a kid in the late 1980s the 26 or 33 card sets were pretty much all star focused and included the same stars from set to set.I don't remember this bothering me at the time but you're right about how rotating the player the way Donruss rotated its Diamond Kings would've been a fun approach.
Messersmith was the pick for a lot of the mid to late 70's odd ball sets, like those MSA discs.
Nick said…
I may not collect many of the more obscure names in those Kellogg's sets but it makes me happy to know they weren't forgotten when Kellogg's was collating their checklist. Seeing someone like Wayne Garland right next to Thurman Munson makes me happy, way happier than the 844th different Jose Altuve card woukd.
John Bateman said…
Reminds me of the Donruss Diamond Kings, It took a couple of years for a player to repeat.
Jafronius said…
Great points sir!
Fuji said…
Oooh. I need that Munson for my set... as well as The Bird.
All I can say is "Amen!"

Popular posts from this blog

Following up (again)

I need to tie off some loose ends about a few different topics, so I'll do that here and then I'll show you some cards from Fuji later. The cards he has been sending out have been all over the blogs lately so what I'll be offering isn't anything new.

So, some housekeeping:

1.  Thanks for your comments on the expansion post from last night. I do appreciate them and I know how fortunate I am to receive the amount of comments I do.

Sometimes, particularly after a very research-driven post that takes hours and hours over several days, if I receive a comment that says nothing but "you forgot this," it rubs the wrong way. That's what happened yesterday, a few times. I should have a thicker skin but I think I wore it off pulling all those cards out of binders and looking up web sites, and typing, typing, typing. I don't expect praise in every comment, but, you know, "yes and ..." is a little more helpful than "yes but ...".

So anyway, I&#…

Playing in the Big League

My 2020 Topps Big League team set arrived in the mail today.

I mentioned the other day that I decided to grab the team set in a bid to avoid buying packs and blasters of a set that I traditionally like too much and therefore spend too much money. The incentive to do this, which was stronger than ever at the start of the year, is even stronger now that the card aisles at Target and Walmart are both danger and disaster zones. (I know I could order blasters online but if I'm not collecting the set, that doesn't make much sense to me).

I realize this undermines the usual trades through the mail but hopefully I'll be opening packs of stuff at some point again this year. The pack rip itch will never go away.

And the thrill of getting these Big League cards all in one shot was too exciting today. As I pulled the cards out of the envelope, Tom Cochrane's "Big League" ran through my head -- "my boy's gonna play in the big league, my boy's gonna turn some…

Beer here

I've been doing fairly well adapting to life without baseball games to watch.

At the beginning of this pandemic, I was like every fan, trying to get my fix with old games on youtube and the MLB Network. Then those reruns lost their thrill and I settled in for a long, boring summer.

But it hasn't been that bad. I haven't moaned about missing baseball much at all.

The one time I did miss it, noticeably so, was last Sunday, Father's Day. To me, Father's Day IS watching baseball games on TV. That's about all there is to that day. Pop open a beer and watch the game. Then watch another and another.

Beer and baseball viewing go together exceeding well, as you know. And, damn, I was missing that combination dearly one week ago.

Beer and baseball combine so well that I once compiled my own All-Beer Team. And here's another illustration of how well beer and baseball go together:

There are some baseball players for which you remember them because of their association…