Skip to main content

C.A.: 1959 Fleer Ted Williams, Ted Relaxes

(It's International Skeptics Day, but I don't know if I believe that. Time for Cardboard Appreciation. This is the 266th in a series):


I ordered that Sandy Koufax short-print card from 2017 Update today, the one where he's pointing at the scoreboard.

It cost me less than a dollar. That's far below the price it was going for back when Update was first released, and I think the thrill of some of these super short-prints of stars of the past is wearing a bit thin. (You could say that for SSPs in general, but let's stick to the topic).

The 2017 Update SSPs of legends haven't seemed particularly special to me. The Bo Jackson SSP is the same photo that appeared in a Topps insert set seven years ago.




The Ted Williams Update SSP is admittedly fun. It shows Williams in fishing attire standing on his boat, attempting to reel in a catch.


The colors are bright. Williams is in action. I kind of wanted this card as Williams has always been my dad's favorite player and I naturally gravitate to a new card of Williams.

But the price was too high at the time and then I lost interest.

Something doesn't look right. Williams, a player from the 1930s, 40s and 50s, doesn't seem to fit on this TV graphics design. He look out of place. Out of time.

This has struck me with other legends on modern designs (lots of Jackie Robinson cards, in fact). But it really made an impression this time.


A few months ago on this blog I mentioned that I should pick up a card from the 1959 Fleer Ted Williams set, in honor of my dad, just so I could say I have at least one card of Williams from when he was still playing.

I had a different card from that set in mind at the time. I don't remember which one it was, but it was before the arrival of the Williams Update fishing card.

That Update card sealed it for me. I had to get a card of Williams fishing from back in 1959.

It cost me much less than what the Update card was going for at the time (although now the price is no  costlier than this '59 Fleer item). And, unlike the Update card, it shows Williams' catch!

Sure, the colors aren't as bright as on the Update card. It's not as flashy. But it makes much more sense to me, the design fits the time, the photo style and subject fits the time.

And the caption: "Ted Relaxes". That is just awesome.


Lots of good stuff on the back and I don't even fish.

Today we want our cards shiny and cut perfectly (this '59 Fleer card is miscut). And maybe Williams on an old cardboard card and not exactly in focus doesn't appeal to every collector.

That's OK. Collect what you want.

To me, the '59 Fleer card is much more logical.

And it will remind me not to chase the short-printed legends, at least not right away. I will wait a bit so the price comes down to my level.

Maybe by that time, I'll realize there is a card that fits my collection even better.

Comments

Commishbob said…
What a wonderful card and a cool one to own given your Dad's fandom. I'm still looking for a DiMaggio card for the same reason.

And I remember seeing the new "Williams fishing" card (maybe here?) and thinking the exact same thing...it doesn't feel right.
Jeff said…
I'll take Williams on real cardboard everyday and twice on Sunday.
Jeremya1um said…
I have the Update Williams if you want it.
Old Cards said…
Give me the old cards with their imperfections. My prize card is a 1958 Ted Williams in good condition. Got it in a batch of cards my neighbor gave me in the 60's when he had moved on from collecting.
Fuji said…
Williams looks much more at home on the '59 Fleer card. However I've got to admit, I like Bo on his 2017 Update card more than on that insert.

P.S. Congratulations on picking up the SP Koufax for under a buck. I'd buy that for a dollar.
Jonathan said…
As a Bo Jackson collector, it really bothers me how many images they just keep reusing. I can't imagine how bad it is for Jackie or Sandy.
Mark Hoyle said…
Love both a Teddy cards. But I too prefer the 59

Popular posts from this blog

The pop culture tax

This isn't really a complaint, just something interesting that I've been noticing.

I'm working on wrapping up a couple of '70s-centric sets right now, getting down to those last 10-20-30 cards, and the usual candidates are being evasive.

I wish I could pick up all the stars early in my set-building quests so the end of the build isn't quite so painful but it never ends up that way. The best of the best usually take the most effort. But I expect that.

What always surprises me is some of the other players that end up being the final few.

Take, for instance, the 1977 Kellogg's set that I'm now trying to complete. I picked up three more cards from that set from Sportlots. The Jose "Cheo" Cruz card was one of them.



The other two were Dodgers, already in my Dodger binders but that doesn't help me complete the set now, does it?

I would've liked to add more with this most recent order but most of the other wants simply weren't available. Here…

Binder, top loader or box?

I want to address two different card package arrivals that don't have much in common other than that one thing that every arriving card package has in common, which is:

How will I store these?

It comes down to three ways: binder, top loader or box.

These means of packaging, storing and presenting are not the same. Ideally, every last card in my collection would be living in a binder. That's my favorite storage method. They're accessible. The cards are presented nicely within. They're very good for categorizing and we card collectors sure do love to categorize. They look good visually when entering the room and when opening the binder.

But I don't have the room for a binder for every card. I can't even process what they would look like. Some edition of "Hoarders," I'm sure.

So the cards that are not deemed "worthy" of a binder -- and, yes, I hate that we're prioritizing like this -- go in a box.

Boxes are for sets that I'm not co…

Yaz, Doc and that other guy

I am not a dedicated player collector because it doesn't fit into how I view baseball and how my collection reflects the history of baseball. Set collecting and team collecting, I believe, do a better job of telling you what's going on in the sport in any given year. And that's important to me.

During my less kind moments, I consider player collecting "stalker-ish," but I do see the value in gathering cards of specific players. I do it myself, but it's a low-key pursuit. There is no drive behind it and no real goals.

The fact is, I do admire certain players instinctively or subconsciously, players who never played for my favorite team.

So, when Jeff of Wax Pack Wonders offered one of his latest giveaways, presented in a very player-collector friendly format, I actually took part, and I didn't pick exclusively Dodgers either.

(Confession time: I didn't pick exclusively Dodgers because my Dodgers collection is a bit, shall we say, "advanced" a…