Skip to main content

The spell is not broken


In yesterday's post I mentioned that I am no longer interested in Topps Chrome. The removal of borders essentially ruined the brand for me (it hasn't helped much with flagship either). But that doesn't mean I can't buy a pack.

I had not been to a card aisle in Target or Walmart in nearly a month. I hadn't even been in any other part of either store. It felt good. There weren't any cravings. I knew what was on the shelves. It didn't interest me. Even the urge to rip wasn't there.

Ah, but addiction has its ways. While running around trying to find food that two 19-year-old girls would eat for dinner, this suddenly popped in my brain: "Hey, I haven't bought any cards at the store in awhile."

It sounded very logical. Rational even. I've been a good boy. It's been many weeks. Surely a few cards after a month wouldn't be an issue. You could even buy 15 cards for $9.98. Who would care?

I was back under the spell.

Walmart was a disaster. Apparently in the month that I had been away, the store had decided to return to its 2009 state and impress me with football and wrestling packs. On to Target I went.

At Target I noticed the repacks (I bought one) and I saw 2017 Chrome for the first time. On one of those 3-pack hangers was a sticker that said "get one free pack of Topps Series 2."

Well, all right. I don't give a snivel about Topps Series 2, but free is free. Sign me up.



I opened the Series 2 pack ready to be disappointed. Sensing this, the Series 2 pack responded with a pack spilling over with Tampa Bay Rays.

One card in the entire pack interested me.


I appreciate any card that reminds people of the greatness of 1970s baseball.

So, then I turned my attention to the Chrome packs. These, in all honesty, were not exciting. And that's a terrible indictment of Chrome, considering the many panting odes I've made to opening packs of Chrome in the past.


Pack 1


#80 Jharel Cotton, A's (former Dodger)



#81 - Cole Hamels, Rangers, negative refractor

I do not understand these at all. This looks like an unfinished baseball card. I want a completed card, not a ghostly representation of a card.



#176 - Brandon Belt, Giants, refractor



#158 - Josh Bell, Pirates

Well, that was riveting.


Pack 2


#157 - Masahiro Tanaka, Yankees



#110 - Steven Matz, Mets



#87T-13 - Luke Weaver, Cardinals, 1987 Tribute For the Thousandth Time

Topps sure likes this guy this year. Not as much as it likes 1987 Topps, but I still haven't figured out who he is.


#14 - Kenta Maeda, Dodgers

The Dodgers suddenly have starting pitching problems.

But I did get a Dodger!


Pack 3


#2 - JaCoby Jones, Tigers



#190 - Brian Dozier, Twins



#FF-7 - Jorge Alfaro, Phillies, Freshman Flash insert

Anyone else see the Creature From the Black Lagoon lurking in the background?



#105 - Adrian Gonzalez, Dodgers

Hey, two Dodgers! This was smart spending after all.


Pinky Parallels

Every one of these comes with three pink parallels. Parallels these days mean giant pink streaks covering the background that makes the card look like an unfinished paint project. I would prefer that the entire background was pink, but I'm sure I'm being too logical.




#12 - Carson Fulmer, White Sox
#126 - Francisco Lindor, Indians
#107 - Yu Darvish, Rangers

Outside of Fulmer, who is another player that Topps forces on us despite his 40.50 ERA this year and virtually nothing else of major league consequence, those were pretty good pinkies.


I can pretty much guarantee that will be my last 2017 Chrome purchase of the year. The spell may not be fully broken. But I know when the spark is gone.

And it's gone.

Comments

SpastikMooss said…
Luke Weaver looks really really REALLY good.
Adam said…
I'm with you, Chrome does nothing for me.
Zippy Zappy said…
If you're moving the pink Fulmer I could give it a good home...
madding said…
I'm fully on board with Luke Weaver, which probably means he'll turn into Michael Wacha.
Jongudmund said…
I agree about the loss of borders. Seems weird that now the special inserts often do have borders but the regular base cards don't.
Jeremya1um said…
I actually picked up a hanger pack of Chrome last week and got the exact same Weaver card (and a printing plate of Mark Canha in the series 2 pack). I actually collect Weaver because he went to high school in DeLand, Florida, which is where I currently live, so if you have any Weavers you don't want, send them my way.
I've never heard of a negative refractor. Does it still shine like a regular one?
BobWalkthePlank said…
Can I be greedy and claim the Bell?
Bubba said…
Chrome this year is disastrous. I thought it merely passable last year, but this year I'm not even remotely enthralled by its glimmer and glam. Makes me very sad.
GCA said…
Even when they're pretty, I can't ever justify so few cards in a pack as Chrome always is.
I've got some heading your way.
defgav said…
I generally love all refractors, but negative refractors are among the ugliest parallels I can think of. Really scraping the bottom of the barrel as far as ways to make a card different.
Brian said…
So maddening that Topps left the rookie cups off the base cards in series 2, but restored them for Topps Chrome (like Kenta Maeda above).
Brian said…
if they were transparent like a film negative, they might be fun.

Popular posts from this blog

This guy was everywhere

It's interesting how athletes from the past are remembered and whether they remain in the public conscious or not.

Hall of Fame players usually survive in baseball conversations long after they've played because they've been immortalized in Cooperstown. Then there are players who didn't reach the Hall but were still very good and somehow, some way, are still remembered.

Players like Dick Allen, Rusty Staub, Vida Blue and Mickey Rivers live on decades later as younger generations pick up on their legacies. Then there are all-stars like Bert Campaneris, who almost never get discussed anymore.

There is just one memory of Campaneris that younger fans most assuredly know. I don't even need to mention it. You know what's coming, even if Lerrin LaGrow didn't.

But there was much more to Campaneris than one momentary loss of reason.

A couple of months ago, when watching old baseball games on youtube hadn't gotten old yet, I was watching a World Series game from…

Some of you have wandered into a giveaway

Thanks to all who voted in the comments for their favorite 1970s Topps card of Bert Campaneris.

I didn't know how this little project would go, since I wasn't installing a poll and, let's face it, the whole theme of the post is how Campaneris these days doesn't get the respect he once did. (Also, I was stunned by the amount of folks who never heard about the bat-throwing moment. Where am I hanging out that I see that mentioned at least every other month?)

A surprising 31 people voted for their favorite Campy and the one with the most votes was the one I saw first, the '75 Topps Campy card above.

The voting totals:

'75 Campy - 11 votes
'70 Campy - 4
'72 Campy - 4
'73 Campy - 4
'76 Campy - 4
'74 Campy - 3
'78 Campy - 1

My thanks to the readers who indulged me with their votes, or even if they didn't vote, their comments on that post. To show my appreciation -- for reading, for commenting, for joining in my card talk even if it might …

Selfless card acts

The trouble with the world, if I may be so bold to weigh in (it's not like anyone else is holding back), is that not enough people think outward.

Take a look at just about every world problem that there is, and within each of those individual maelstroms, is somebody, usually a lot of folks, thinking only of themselves.

Looking out for No. 1 is a big, big problem on this earth. One of the biggest. And it's not getting better. I see it coming from all directions and all sides. No one is innocent. Everyone is guilty. Selfishness is the crime.

Our hobby is not immune. That's what makes the baseball card blog community so great, because it's a daily example of what can be achieved when you think of others first, before yourself.

Selflessness is such a staple of card blogs that some collectors have become immune to its charms. "Oh boy, here's another post about what somebody got thanks to the goodness of someone's heart. I don't need to read THAT." I a…