Skip to main content

Missed it the first time

I really wish Topps would stop releasing next year's design on a day when I'm incredibly busy.

Some quick thoughts that you've probably already read before and then I'll get on with what I was supposed to be writing about today.

The above design was not a surprise. Given the previous two flagship designs and Topps' apparent desire to make the design look as digital-friendly as possible, I fully expected full-bleed with various TV graphics elements. And that's what this is.

It's executed a heck of lot better than the 2016 look and also better than 2017. I don't see any tinkering with the picture here, which was a serious drawback with both 2016 and 2017.

Still, I'd rather have borders. They make an individual set distinctive and memorable. They also don't make parallels irrelevant. And they make the cards more collectible. I won't be collecting this.

Three straight years of this stuff means Topps may be challenging 1996-2000 as the least memorable era of flagship. I don't think it's there yet, but a couple more designs like these "we miss you so much early '90s Stadium Club/Ultra!" looks and 1996 Topps may not seem so bad.

On the good side, every team logo gets to go for a ride down a waterslide next year!!!!

OK, onto the actual post:

What do you do when you receive in the mail cards that you own already?

There are a few options: throw them in the dupes box, set them aside for fellow traders, or throw a tantrum, lock the door and vow never to come out until someone gives you a card you need.

I'm happy to say I do all three (well, I've only done the third one once). I also do something else: I try to find something I missed the first time.

I recently received some cards from a reader Jonathan, who was nice enough to mention he enjoyed my blog and wanted to send some cards as thanks. He was willing to tackle my no-longer-complete want list, which means he couldn't have possibly have known what I need other than "Dodgers".

In the package were some cards I needed and some cards I didn't. Here are some cards I didn't need, but found something I missed the first time:

Billy Ashley's middle name is "Manuel". I totally missed that the first time. I think if his name was Manny Ashley, he may have enjoyed a more successful career.

More Ashley fun. I've always liked these Studio cards from 1995 for how much they replicate credit cards from that time, right down to the black strip on the back. But somehow I totally missed the signed name, similar to how you'd sign on that blank strip on the back of your credit card. How did I miss something that obvious? I don't know. Good thing I got another one of these cards, huh?

I totally missed the first time that this card uses the highly-overlooked technical term of "taters" for home runs. I think "taters" needs to come back right now. And please, for all that is good and baseball, have it replace "dongs." Taters forever.

I completely missed the first time that Eddie Murray is wearing an Angels helmet and pullover on the back of his card. This may be a final tribute to Murray, who ended his career in a Dodger uniform, but Upper Deck couldn't quite get it right.

All right, by now you're asking -- Jonathan in particular -- weren't there any cards that you needed?


Here they are:

A J.D. Drew swatch Zenith card to go with my J.D. Drew bat-relic Zenith card.

A Charles Johnson Metal card so I can remember again his miserable time with the Dodgers.

Two 1987 Fleer glossy cards and I'm so glad that "glossy" was noted on the penny sleeve. I'm quite sure I have glossy parallels sitting in the giant dupes box.

A 1955 Bowman Carl Erskine, which is likely in much better shape than my version, even with the scribble on the back.

Another "Scrambling After Ball" card just because I can't get enough of these.

A '56 Wayne Terwilliger card that apparently is very tasty.

And this monster-sized Donruss Studio Hideo Nomo item that will challenge my "full-sized page" inventory.

One thing's for sure about this card: it's definitely not to be missed.


Mike Matson said…
I've never seen the 1992 Donruss Rookies cards.. I think that might have to be added to my want list to complete the 1992s lol
The Nationals use taters all the time for their home runs -- you should follow them instead of the Dodgers. (I realize you may now block me). They also server delicious tater tots at Nationals Park. I eat them with mustard and get weird looks. But they are super tasty with it.
The 2018 set is an improvement over 2016 and 2017, however the drifting pixels baffle me. It makes the card seem unfinished and despite not even buying this set yet I already am very irritated by them. I will say that I like other parts like the wave and the picture quality is very good as usual.
Sascards67 said…
Topps doesn't care about us long time collector's that would welcome borders because we buy the Archives and Heritage sets.
John Bateman said…
That not a slide but Mick Jagger's Tongue

OK working backwards

2016-2018 No borders
2015-2018 No White Borders
2009-2014 White Borders Larger Photos
2008-2014 White Borders
2003-2008 Small player photos big borders (except maybe 2006 - 2006 is an outlier set
1996-2002 Vast wasteland of baseball cards - I have no visual recollection of what these cards look like
1998-2003 Color Border (did 1997 have color borders??, no recollection of)
1992-1995 Beginning of the end - heading to the waste land of card
1991 End of the Golden Age, when Topps made cards and did not think about what they were doing
1952-1990 The Golden Age, when errors were errors and not personal manipulation

Based on the above I don't think we will see white borders until 2020
Classon Ave said…
Great looking '55 Bowman.

My first impression of '18 is I like it a lot better than the last two years, but thats a very low bar.
ketchupman36 said…
You make a good point that this design does no favors for parallels. Damn near makes them extinct
Brett Alan said…
The parallels would all have the player and team names in various stages of destruction. In some the can be washed away by the wave, and in others the tails could just have frayed further. "I have the team name broken up parallel, but not the team dame drowning parallel." Good times.
Michael Ott said…
Maybe your other Ashley has his middle name spelled "Manuel". I'm not sure I've ever met a Manual (except the one with instructions for programming the VCR).
Fuji said…
If 2017 Topps Bunt and 1992 Fleer Ultra hooked up and had a baby, their child would look like 2018 Topps.
Jeremya1um said…
It looks like last years Bowman and a water slide had a child. The Ashley's are sweet. I always thought he would be a 40+ HR guy if he got a chance.
Jeremya1um said…
I meant 2017 Bowman, not 2016.
Old Cards said…
Today's cards are real sleepers. Ho hum! Thanks for posting the Topps cards from 1960 and 1956. The 1956 card is better than the new cards even with the corner chewed off.
carlsonjok said…
Wait? They are calling home runs "dongs" now?

To quote the young 'uns: I. Can't. Even.
Brian said…
Maybe Ashley would have had an easier time if his middle name was "Automatic."

Popular posts from this blog

This guy was everywhere

It's interesting how athletes from the past are remembered and whether they remain in the public conscious or not.

Hall of Fame players usually survive in baseball conversations long after they've played because they've been immortalized in Cooperstown. Then there are players who didn't reach the Hall but were still very good and somehow, some way, are still remembered.

Players like Dick Allen, Rusty Staub, Vida Blue and Mickey Rivers live on decades later as younger generations pick up on their legacies. Then there are all-stars like Bert Campaneris, who almost never get discussed anymore.

There is just one memory of Campaneris that younger fans most assuredly know. I don't even need to mention it. You know what's coming, even if Lerrin LaGrow didn't.

But there was much more to Campaneris than one momentary loss of reason.

A couple of months ago, when watching old baseball games on youtube hadn't gotten old yet, I was watching a World Series game from…

Some of you have wandered into a giveaway

Thanks to all who voted in the comments for their favorite 1970s Topps card of Bert Campaneris.

I didn't know how this little project would go, since I wasn't installing a poll and, let's face it, the whole theme of the post is how Campaneris these days doesn't get the respect he once did. (Also, I was stunned by the amount of folks who never heard about the bat-throwing moment. Where am I hanging out that I see that mentioned at least every other month?)

A surprising 31 people voted for their favorite Campy and the one with the most votes was the one I saw first, the '75 Topps Campy card above.

The voting totals:

'75 Campy - 11 votes
'70 Campy - 4
'72 Campy - 4
'73 Campy - 4
'76 Campy - 4
'74 Campy - 3
'78 Campy - 1

My thanks to the readers who indulged me with their votes, or even if they didn't vote, their comments on that post. To show my appreciation -- for reading, for commenting, for joining in my card talk even if it might …

Selfless card acts

The trouble with the world, if I may be so bold to weigh in (it's not like anyone else is holding back), is that not enough people think outward.

Take a look at just about every world problem that there is, and within each of those individual maelstroms, is somebody, usually a lot of folks, thinking only of themselves.

Looking out for No. 1 is a big, big problem on this earth. One of the biggest. And it's not getting better. I see it coming from all directions and all sides. No one is innocent. Everyone is guilty. Selfishness is the crime.

Our hobby is not immune. That's what makes the baseball card blog community so great, because it's a daily example of what can be achieved when you think of others first, before yourself.

Selflessness is such a staple of card blogs that some collectors have become immune to its charms. "Oh boy, here's another post about what somebody got thanks to the goodness of someone's heart. I don't need to read THAT." I a…