Skip to main content

C.A.: 1980 Topps 1979 Highlights Garry Templeton

(Greetings on "Waffle Day". A week or so ago I read about somebody putting brownie batter in their waffle maker and I haven't been able to think about anything else since. It's time for Cardboard Appreciation. This is the 253rd in a series):

Yesterday was Garry Templeton's birthday. Ballplayers' birthdays are always a nice occasion to dig out the birthday boy's card and showcase it on social media.

I chose this particular card because everyone had already shown the rookie cup Templeton card and because who doesn't appreciate the very cool stat of one player getting 100 hits from each side of the plate in a single season?

I've known about Templeton's feat since it happened, it was kind of a big deal. And the record breaker card always helps hammer the achievement home in my memory.

I started to wonder what other switch-hitters had achieved 100 hits on both sides of the plate since Templeton. I had known that Willie Wilson had accomplished the feat the very next year but never heard about anyone else doing it.

So I did a little bit of online research and found out that Templeton wasn't really the first player with 100 hits on either side of the plate, because he never actually achieved it.

(*Mind blown*)

If you check out the splits on Templeton's baseball-reference page, you will see that he managed just 96 hits as a right-handed batter in 1979.

For his 211 total hits in 1979, 115 came as a left-handed batter and 96 as a right-handed batter.

Why the discrepancy? Well, according to this thread, they didn't count the hits up so well in 1979. Someone informed Templeton that he had 93 hits as a right-handed batter when it was really 89. Templeton started batting right-handed every at-bat to achieve the mark (a move that didn't endear him to the next Cardinals manager, Whitey Herzog), and according to the back of his 1980 baseball card, he reached 100 hits as a right-hander with a bunt single.

Except that he didn't. It was really his 96th hit from the right side of the plate.

I don't know what goes into the statistical gathering with baseball-reference and, so I can't say that baseball-reference's stats are 100 percent accurate. But let's face facts. We are far more efficient and fanatical in gathering baseball stats than we ever were in 1979.

The thing that blows my mind is how this was considered absolute fact when it happened and for many years. And Templeton has been credited for the achievement on many a baseball card.

So, not only is the 1980 Highlights card incorrect, but so are the backs of many of Templeton's cards.




Still incorrect.

And there are many more.

1983 Donruss, 1985 Donruss, 1986 Donruss, 1987 Donruss, 1988 Donruss, 1989 Donruss and 1991 Donruss all mention this feat that never happened.

The same goes for 1988, 1989 and 1990 Score. And 1983 Fleer. And 1981 and 1983 Kellogg's.

Damn right, it's close to the impossible, 1981 Kellogg's.

All of the above cards jumped the gun. Templeton never had 100 hits as a right-hander in a single year.

So that means Willie Wilson, who in 1980 was reported to have reached 100 hits from each side of the plate as part of the 230 he accumulated that year, is the first person to accomplish it, right?

Uh, no.

According to his baseball-reference splits, Wilson came up a single hit short on the left side.

(*Mind blown again*)

This is staggering to me. Not merely from the standpoint that I thought all these years that Templeton and Wilson had achieved this, but that it was discovered to be not true and nobody really said anything about it.

When Templeton achieved the feat, it was trumpeted in the newspapers and magazines and a baseball card was made. You can read mentions of it in published books, for crying out loud.

But virtually no mention of "never mind, that didn't happen." Shouldn't MLB or the media or someone have said something?

Looking online, I see virtually no mention of this feat never happening. And it's funny that among the more noted baseball sites and news publications, achieving 100 hits from both sides of the plate is barely mentioned. It's like nobody cares today.

I think that might be because nobody has achieved the mark. I can't find anyone else mentioned besides Templeton and Wilson.

It's funny how certain baseball stats can be so trumpeted and almost sacrosanct for years and then with the passage of time, they are ignored, not even to mention whether they're true or false.

So what is it about these other 1980 Highlights card that isn't true (I'm already aware that Mota doesn't hold the all-time pinch-hit record anymore)?

I don't think I want to know.


steelehere said…
I'm surprised that Pete Rose never accomplished this feat considering how self-absorbed he was into his own achievements.
Mike Matson said…
The closest Rose ever got was 1977 114 hits vs RHP, 90 vs LHP.
There were some years when he had 200+ hits that he had less than 50 vs LHP
Commishbob said…
And here we thought Kellyanne Conway invented #altenativefacts.

Seems like someone in '79 would have done better research into this as Templeton approached the 100/100 Club threshold.

Gotta love the cardback blurb on the '88 Score: "...a talented, though undisciplined free swinger..." LOL
Brian said…
Good Old Score, never too polite to miss a chance at a good back-handed compliment!
gcrl said…
I remember when cobb's 4191 hits became 4189 hits well after we all celebrated Pete Rose's 4192 and I thought for sure that Elias wild at some point discover that Lou gehrig missed a game somewhere early on in his streak.
gcrl said…
Elias would at some point...

Stubby said…
Definitions keep changing. Base-on-balls, in olden days, were lumped in with hits in determining batting records. And, for example, there was no such thing as a "Save" prior to 1969, but Baseball-Reference includes the stat for pitchers whose careers were long done before 1969. How are we to know for sure that their retroactive computations are accurate? How do they know? Not only that, but the definition of a "Save" changed a few times between 1969 and 1975, but all the pre-69 pitchers' Save stats are based on the '69 rule (let's face it, the historians didn't want to go back and recalculate a second or third time; and I can relate). Even today, you'll occasionally see adjustments in stats after the fact. Someone inadvertently included a spring training hit or some such thing. But, when the season ends, whatever happened happened...even if it didn't. No one wants to go back (excepting, perhaps, a player negotiating a new contract) and declare that the guy who won the batting title actually didn't. So Gary Templeton DID get 100 hits from each side of the plate...even if he didn't. Because, at season's end, it was *believed* that he had done so. And baseball cards don't lie...even if they do.
night owl said…
I think the part that intrigues me is that Templeton was mentioned as the FIRST to do it when in fact it actually has never been done. So when someone actually does get 100 hits from both sides of the plate, won't that be an interesting story?
GCA said…
Well, I see where you can definitely say Templeton fell short. There are stats for him as right and left batter vs. right and left pitchers (of all types). All four combos are accounted for.
But that group of stats for Wilson is incomplete. He could have had more hits batting right against right-handers. That's not listed anywhere there. You can't necessarily assume that he always batted the opposite hand of the pitcher.
night owl said…
I'm not sure I know what your saying. Wilson had 230 hits in 1980. All of his hits are accounted for in that left vs. right/right vs. left breakdown. Even if there's a category missing (and perhaps the category is missing because that matchup never happened), there would be no hits to account for in that category.
Classon Ave said…
Is it possible that the Cardinals kept better internal stats than the kid in the press box, at least as far as what side of the plate he was batting from? W
acrackedbat said…
brownie batter in a waffle maker? i saw nothing else after reading that. arghh!
Fuji said…
That kinda sucks that Templeton's highlight is a lie. But damn... that photo Topps used for him on that card is awesome!

Popular posts from this blog

This guy was everywhere

It's interesting how athletes from the past are remembered and whether they remain in the public conscious or not.

Hall of Fame players usually survive in baseball conversations long after they've played because they've been immortalized in Cooperstown. Then there are players who didn't reach the Hall but were still very good and somehow, some way, are still remembered.

Players like Dick Allen, Rusty Staub, Vida Blue and Mickey Rivers live on decades later as younger generations pick up on their legacies. Then there are all-stars like Bert Campaneris, who almost never get discussed anymore.

There is just one memory of Campaneris that younger fans most assuredly know. I don't even need to mention it. You know what's coming, even if Lerrin LaGrow didn't.

But there was much more to Campaneris than one momentary loss of reason.

A couple of months ago, when watching old baseball games on youtube hadn't gotten old yet, I was watching a World Series game from…

Some of you have wandered into a giveaway

Thanks to all who voted in the comments for their favorite 1970s Topps card of Bert Campaneris.

I didn't know how this little project would go, since I wasn't installing a poll and, let's face it, the whole theme of the post is how Campaneris these days doesn't get the respect he once did. (Also, I was stunned by the amount of folks who never heard about the bat-throwing moment. Where am I hanging out that I see that mentioned at least every other month?)

A surprising 31 people voted for their favorite Campy and the one with the most votes was the one I saw first, the '75 Topps Campy card above.

The voting totals:

'75 Campy - 11 votes
'70 Campy - 4
'72 Campy - 4
'73 Campy - 4
'76 Campy - 4
'74 Campy - 3
'78 Campy - 1

My thanks to the readers who indulged me with their votes, or even if they didn't vote, their comments on that post. To show my appreciation -- for reading, for commenting, for joining in my card talk even if it might …

Selfless card acts

The trouble with the world, if I may be so bold to weigh in (it's not like anyone else is holding back), is that not enough people think outward.

Take a look at just about every world problem that there is, and within each of those individual maelstroms, is somebody, usually a lot of folks, thinking only of themselves.

Looking out for No. 1 is a big, big problem on this earth. One of the biggest. And it's not getting better. I see it coming from all directions and all sides. No one is innocent. Everyone is guilty. Selfishness is the crime.

Our hobby is not immune. That's what makes the baseball card blog community so great, because it's a daily example of what can be achieved when you think of others first, before yourself.

Selflessness is such a staple of card blogs that some collectors have become immune to its charms. "Oh boy, here's another post about what somebody got thanks to the goodness of someone's heart. I don't need to read THAT." I a…