Skip to main content

SSP: Super SP or Stupid SP?

I mentioned in the last post that I received some cards from Royals and Randoms. The star of the package was this short-print of Clayton Kershaw from last year's flagship set. Josh pulled it out of a repack, which doesn't amaze me too much anymore as I've seen all kinds of cool things come out of repacks over the years.

This card is more rare than your average Allen & Ginter/Heritage short-print. It's known as an "SSP" in hobby abbreviation lingo, which stands for "super short-print," although many times I've called it a "stupid short-print."

I am conflicted about these like I am about many modern day inventions in the hobby. On one hand the card is indisputably stellar. I've been a fan of card variations since the late 1970s when I first saw Burger King cards. There is nothing that will turn my head quite like a different photo of the same player on the same design.

But on the other hand -- the stupid hand -- there is the intentional rarity, the selecting of a photo that is quite appealing but limiting it in order to get people to spend more money for it. That kind of cynicism is what killed the hobby that I knew in the '70s and '80s.

I would much rather have photos like this in the base set. Flagship sets are filled with action photos, no doubt fully supported by MLB, which wants to make sure we think these players are superheroes (but with hearts of gold). But growing up collecting in the '70s and '80s, I saw a mix of action, candid and posed photos. I still prefer that.

But in order to get candid photos like players hanging out in the dugout blowing bubbles, I have to shell out extra money.

We did not shell out extra money for blowing bubbles in the '70s and '80s. Heck we didn't even do it in the '90s.

Those are all cards of players blowing bubbles ... in the base set. There was no need to spend $12 to buy one of these cards.

Don't get me wrong, Clayton Kershaw's 2015 Topps base card is terrific.

I called it "beautiful" the moment I pulled it from a pack.

I also known that there are still some candid photos in Topps flagship. I guess I'd just like more of a mix. When I see an SSP of a player blowing a bubble or juggling baseballs or wearing goofy glasses, my mind goes right to the hundreds of closeups of pitchers efforting on the mound, one weird strained face after another with nothing to differentiate the players except the uniform colors (i.e. their superhero cape).

Saving all the cool cards for the super/stupid short-prints just says that Topps (and many collectors now) doesn't care about the base set.

I'll still say variations are cool -- because dammit my brain still says they are -- but I sure wish I didn't have to pay the asking price for those.

Fortunately, with Kershaw's SSP I was able to work out a trade. Writing this blog pays off again.

I got a few more cards in the package to go with Stupid-Super Kersh.

Josh must've been eating a lot of sunflower seeds in the early '90s. These never cease to crack me up.

Woooo. Prospects in logo-less uniforms! That was a bright idea.

A clean white swatch from former hobby sensation Kaz Ishii. If you want to know how little people care about 2002, just look up the prices on Kaz Ishii cards.

This is one of my favorite Shawn Green relics. And I've seen a lot of Shawn Green relics.

Finally, a pocket schedule. From last year's Dodger season. Yay!

This is reminiscent of a Dodger yearbook from my youth:

Note the price on that yearbook.

That's not going to buy any SSPs.


acrackedbat said…
Paying out the nose for a bubble-bursting sp = wrong.
Cardboard Jones said…
It's an absolutely glorious card. Would much rather chase after short-printed variations than colored parallels (or sparkly ones, or snowflake ones, or...)
Fuji said…
Cool card. I have no issues with SSP cards... other than the fact that I'll never know how many I've actually given away to students or fellow bloggers, because I didn't realize it was a short print. Then again... my loss is their gain.
Anonymous said…
It's tough to be a team collector and feel the desire/need to grab all the variations...overwhelming!
Commishbob said…
SPs, SSPs, SSSSPs... part of why I don't care about collecting more than a couple cards from any one current set.

Oh, and Program porn!!!! Love it!
RunForeKelloggs said…
I was just telling my younger brother about SSPs last week. To me SSPs were those awesome early 1970s cars that had a rip cord. Pull the cord and it would travel at least 50 yards. Do you remember those? I'd prefer to get one of those again instead of the SSP cards.
Stack22 said…
I really hate the SP/SPP/Variation photos on base cards. I feel like they violate the fragile peace between traditional set builders like myself, and insert chasers. They can have their individually numbered argyle chrome refractor spinwheel cards with DNA slices and jock-straps cut up and inserted into them. That's fine. I don't want them, and if I pull one I can send them to someone who does.

These though feel like base cards, and as a base card, I should have it, and their shouldn't be more than one card per number in a set. It's irritating.
Josh D. said…
Though I live in California now, all the California Sunflower Seeds cards came to me over Christmas from my mom who volunteers at a thrift store. In Iowa. Someone had donated a box and she called me to ask if she should buy them. She gave me the box that had quite a few Seeds cards, some Mother's Cookies cards, some Starline/Long John Silver's cards, and then some miscellaneous junk base. So the California food-release collector decided to donate all his stuff to a middle America thrift store....

Popular posts from this blog

Following up (again)

I need to tie off some loose ends about a few different topics, so I'll do that here and then I'll show you some cards from Fuji later. The cards he has been sending out have been all over the blogs lately so what I'll be offering isn't anything new.

So, some housekeeping:

1.  Thanks for your comments on the expansion post from last night. I do appreciate them and I know how fortunate I am to receive the amount of comments I do.

Sometimes, particularly after a very research-driven post that takes hours and hours over several days, if I receive a comment that says nothing but "you forgot this," it rubs the wrong way. That's what happened yesterday, a few times. I should have a thicker skin but I think I wore it off pulling all those cards out of binders and looking up web sites, and typing, typing, typing. I don't expect praise in every comment, but, you know, "yes and ..." is a little more helpful than "yes but ...".

So anyway, I&#…

Playing in the Big League

My 2020 Topps Big League team set arrived in the mail today.

I mentioned the other day that I decided to grab the team set in a bid to avoid buying packs and blasters of a set that I traditionally like too much and therefore spend too much money. The incentive to do this, which was stronger than ever at the start of the year, is even stronger now that the card aisles at Target and Walmart are both danger and disaster zones. (I know I could order blasters online but if I'm not collecting the set, that doesn't make much sense to me).

I realize this undermines the usual trades through the mail but hopefully I'll be opening packs of stuff at some point again this year. The pack rip itch will never go away.

And the thrill of getting these Big League cards all in one shot was too exciting today. As I pulled the cards out of the envelope, Tom Cochrane's "Big League" ran through my head -- "my boy's gonna play in the big league, my boy's gonna turn some…

Beer here

I've been doing fairly well adapting to life without baseball games to watch.

At the beginning of this pandemic, I was like every fan, trying to get my fix with old games on youtube and the MLB Network. Then those reruns lost their thrill and I settled in for a long, boring summer.

But it hasn't been that bad. I haven't moaned about missing baseball much at all.

The one time I did miss it, noticeably so, was last Sunday, Father's Day. To me, Father's Day IS watching baseball games on TV. That's about all there is to that day. Pop open a beer and watch the game. Then watch another and another.

Beer and baseball viewing go together exceeding well, as you know. And, damn, I was missing that combination dearly one week ago.

Beer and baseball combine so well that I once compiled my own All-Beer Team. And here's another illustration of how well beer and baseball go together:

There are some baseball players for which you remember them because of their association…