Skip to main content

Resistance is futile


One thing that I have learned from operating a popular blog is that people actually do read the words that I write. However, when they extract the meaning from those words, it is sometimes what they want it to mean, not what I want it to mean.

For example, I fully expect to receive Donruss puzzle pieces in the mail after yesterday's post. Even though I wrote in that post that I have no desire to complete any of the incomplete puzzles that I showed, people will interpret that post as me saying that I desperately want to complete them.

All right. Whatever. Bring on the puzzle pieces. If that's the price to pay for people coming to your blog every day, I'm up for it. Resistance is futile.

And, here, I have another example for you.

A couple of weeks ago, I showed off a very large box of goodies sent to me by Rob, a.k.a., steelehere. I took some of the contents of that box and turned it into a contest.

Well, that wasn't the only box Rob sent.

There was a second one, and before it arrived, Rob sent me an email. In it he said the following:

"You'll see something that you're not a big fan of but it definitely fills a need of yours."

Great. Somebody else deciding what I need.

But I've got a somewhat open mind, so no big deal, and not too long after that email the second box showed up. It is quite possibly the heaviest card package I've ever received. And the contents are good for at least three posts, probably more (don't worry, I'll space them out).

One of the items that weighed down that box is the same item that Rob "warned" me about.


What you see there is a complete set of 1987 Topps.

If you've read this blog for awhile you know that I have said on several occasions that not only had I not completed the 1987 Topps set but that I really had no desire to complete it. Even though every other Topps set from the '80s sits complete in a binder in my card room, there was no aching hole in my collecting soul that would only be filled by 1987 Topps.

Obviously, Rob would have none of it.


So I now own what probably thousands of other collectors own -- every card from 1 to 792 of 1987 Topps.

For decades I owned maybe 150-200 cards from 1987 Topps. That's what resulted from the packs that I bought that year. Over the last 10 years or so, I accumulated about 200 more cards from the set, through repacks mostly. The cards -- although wildly popular with those who grew up during the junk wax era -- didn't thrill me any more than they did in 1987.


Obviously, these cards were everywhere. You could argue that 1987 Topps was the most overproduced of all sets (I still see more 1989 Topps). And I started to think, wouldn't it be interesting if I could come close to completing 1987 Topps passively? What if I just kept buying repacks and such and suddenly I had 715 cards from the set? Wouldn't that be cool?


Rob apparently thought this was silly. "Who collects like this?" he must have said.

It's pretty obvious how Rob collected the set. As you probably saw from the picture, the set is jammed into one box. Seventy-nine different penny sleeves contain 10 or so cards from the set. Rob said the set has been stored like this for decades and I can tell.

Inside some of the penny sleeves are certain cards protected by their own penny sleeve.


These are the cards that in 1987 terms were determined to be VALUABLE. They were investments, destined to rocket in price and pay for your waterfront home. So, yes, players like Tony Gwynn and Roger Clemens are contained in their own penny sleeves, but also players like Billy Jo Robidoux here. The fact that Bruce Ruffin and Tracy Jones and Robby Thompson receive their own penny sleeves is ... well, I'm trying not to snicker, but sooooooo late 1980s.

Collectors in 1987 were adorable.

It's entirely possible that Rob at one point tried to sell this box for one million dollars.



But enough of me poking wise. There is something else I want to get to with this set.

During my collecting days, I've seen more than my share of junk wax. Certain cards I have seen so many times that they lose their meaning. How many times do I need to see the 1989 Topps Roberto Alomar Jr. card? The same amount of times I need to hear "Eye Of The Tiger" again, that's how many times.

There are plenty of those same cards in 1987 Topps. Dave Bergman, Paul Molitor, Alejandro Pena, I've seen them more times than the inside of my own car.

But if you're a set collector, you know what I'm getting at next.


There are cards -- yes, even in 1987 Topps -- that I have never seen before. In fact, every '87 card that I have shown so far in this post is a card I have never seen before.

How is that possible? It's possible because unless you attempt to collect a set, you'll never see all of the cards that need to be seen from that year. You will be deprived of certain golden gems. And this is one of the greatest parts of set collecting. The joy of discovery. And by the time you've completed the set, you will have discovered them all.


Ray Soff. Until the moment I prepared for this post by looking through as many cards in this box as I could, I had never heard of Ray Soff. 1987 Topps has been around for 28 years, and I'm now just discovering someone named Ray Soff.

That doesn't seem right. I should have known there was a Ray Soff a long time ago.

Rob probably thought so, too. And that's why I now have a complete set of 1987 Topps.

And that means I have now completed Topps sets from 1974 through 1989. And I know all the players from all of those sets.

So, yeah, I guess this did fill a need of mine. Although now I have to get a binder and all of that.

Plus, now I have like 400 dupes of 1987 Topps -- like every other collector on the planet.

Heh. Anybody need any?

Comments

Zippy Zappy said…
If you're moving any Yankees/Pirates dupes, I'll take them. Got some foreign contacts who think of "vintage" as pre-1995 so... :).
Big Tone said…
What's cool about recouping some of those old sets/cards Is If you can get them In good condition.I've had a ton of 87 Topps Keith Hernandez cards,but they pale In comparison to a crispy,clean copy with 4 sharp corners.I've always liked the Boggs from this set.1987 Topps also marks the return of the Golden Cup!
Nachos Grande said…
I'm using 1987 Topps cards as packing material for my recent group break. I think after this break I'll finally be out of the stuff (and no, I do not want your duplicates - I already have my own set complete, thank you very much)!
Mike Matson said…
I'm still trying to complete this set
Hackenbush said…
Gee, if I'd known you had wanted a set... I have three sealed factory versions about six feet from where I'm sitting. I did buy them new thinking they'd be worth something in 2015 (or a lot earlier). I'm not very bright.
AdamE said…
Dies this mean your going to take a more serious stab at 73?
I need to get on Rob's Christmas list :-)

I'm always tempted by the prospect of players from the 75 Topps set in other years but I don't think the cardboard's worth the shipping cost...
BobWalkthePlank said…
The Spike Owen card would have been perfect for F*** Face on the bat
Stack22 said…
I'm certainly of the age demographic that considers '87 an iconic classic. Due in no small part to the fact the largest portion of my father's collection to survive the thieving hands of my much older cousins was '62 Topps. It served as a tangible connection, at least in my mind, between myself and my father.
GCA said…
I got my '87 set two years ago from a starter set from my friend, which we then completed the next day at the LCS down the street, pulling every other card from the bulk boxes of junk wax, including the Bonds. Started and finished it in two days. In 2013.

Now if I could only find a cheap box of 1985....
Paul Hadsall said…
I'm with you on the 1987 Topps set. I have way too many cards from it to ever really appreciate it, and the design has not aged well. But at least it looks nicer than 1986 or 1988 did.
Rob said…
I only know who Ray Soff is because he was born in my hometown!
night owl said…
No new set collecting project gets serious until I finish 1972.
I'm actually a big fan of the '87 set. It was the first time I had gotten back into collecting after a few years break. I bought a lot...a real lot of it.
Fuji said…
1987 Topps recently moved into my top 10 list of favorite Topps baseball card sets. It's got a solid design... and I like a lot of the photographs. It also played a significant role for me in terms of card collecting. Congratulations on adding it to your collection.

Popular posts from this blog

This guy was everywhere

It's interesting how athletes from the past are remembered and whether they remain in the public conscious or not.

Hall of Fame players usually survive in baseball conversations long after they've played because they've been immortalized in Cooperstown. Then there are players who didn't reach the Hall but were still very good and somehow, some way, are still remembered.

Players like Dick Allen, Rusty Staub, Vida Blue and Mickey Rivers live on decades later as younger generations pick up on their legacies. Then there are all-stars like Bert Campaneris, who almost never get discussed anymore.

There is just one memory of Campaneris that younger fans most assuredly know. I don't even need to mention it. You know what's coming, even if Lerrin LaGrow didn't.

But there was much more to Campaneris than one momentary loss of reason.

A couple of months ago, when watching old baseball games on youtube hadn't gotten old yet, I was watching a World Series game from…

Some of you have wandered into a giveaway

Thanks to all who voted in the comments for their favorite 1970s Topps card of Bert Campaneris.

I didn't know how this little project would go, since I wasn't installing a poll and, let's face it, the whole theme of the post is how Campaneris these days doesn't get the respect he once did. (Also, I was stunned by the amount of folks who never heard about the bat-throwing moment. Where am I hanging out that I see that mentioned at least every other month?)

A surprising 31 people voted for their favorite Campy and the one with the most votes was the one I saw first, the '75 Topps Campy card above.

The voting totals:

'75 Campy - 11 votes
'70 Campy - 4
'72 Campy - 4
'73 Campy - 4
'76 Campy - 4
'74 Campy - 3
'78 Campy - 1

My thanks to the readers who indulged me with their votes, or even if they didn't vote, their comments on that post. To show my appreciation -- for reading, for commenting, for joining in my card talk even if it might …

Return of the king

(If you haven't voted for your favorite Bert Campaneris '70s card in the last post, I invite you to do so).

So you've been away for a few years and want everyone to know that you're back.

How do you do that?

Do what The Diamond King did when he returned to card blogging last month: Bombard readers with contests and giveaways! Well, you've certainly gotten MY attention, sir!

I'll start with the giveaways first. Since he returned, the Diamond King has issued multiple "Diamond King 9" giveaways, straight out of the chute and rapid fire in the last month-plus. As I've said before, I am very slow to get to these "first come, first serve" giveaways. I used to think "I spend too much time on the computer" and now I realize "I don't spend enough time on the computer at all!"

But I was able to nab two cards out of the many giveaways.


I won this key 1981 Fleer Star Sticker of The Hawk. I have since acquired several more &#…