Skip to main content

The commemorative trifecta

As soon as the Dodgers clinched the World Series title, I knew I would need to complete the commemorative trifecta.

It's pretty natural to want to have something tangible to remember a championship moment by your sports team. Videos are great, but they just don't mean as much to me as a physical object that I possess -- I can admire it quietly or take it with me.

For me, the commemorative trifecta is something you can wear that recognizes the championship, a publication that recounts the event, and a group of baseball cards that recalls the excitement.

About a month after the Dodgers won the Series, I received a commemorative Dodgers Series cap. I still need a piece of clothing. My wife has that but I don't (what's the deal with that?). I'll get something at some point, hopefully at a marked-down price.
I don't have a publication yet -- I would like to get the World Series program -- but the baseball cards finally arrived yesterday!

Yup, I decided to purchase the Topps x Ben Baller Dodgers World Series champions online-only set!
Now, before you get too judgy, a few points:
✳ Yes, back in the old days we waited until the following season for Topps to recognize the previous year's World Series champions. I get that, and I'm willing to wait for the Heritage cards that will recognize that. However, we've been living in a time of special commemorative World Series sets for more than a decade. I remember seeing the Topps 2004 Red Sox commemorative set maybe a couple of years after it came out and I thought that was a terrific idea. Also with the weird state of the hobby, who knows how long it'll take me to obtain cards that were once commonly available on store shelves.
✳ I like the look of the cards. To me, this is a better alternative to throwing money at Topps Now cards recognizing the World Series. Yeah, those cards have photos of actual game moments. But the presentation of those cards doesn't do it for me. Nothing about Topps Now makes me want to collect it.
✳ I didn't pay the ridiculous $100-$140 this set is going for on ebay.
I paid $33, plus shipping, for a set that advertised, "no box, no autograph" but all of the 32 cards in the set.
Fine with me. Who cares about a box? And who cares about the auto? Is an auto really worth charging an extra $67? That's insane. I don't want an auto in my commemorative Dodgers World Series set anyway. It'd look out of place.
When the package arrived (yes, it was delayed), it actually came in the commemorative box, so I don't know what I didn't get.
The cards are designed by artist and jewelry dude Ben Baller, who you probably know as one of the Project 2020 artists. He's one of the better ones in my opinion, although his obsession with gold chains is a bit too ... uh ... "baller" for me.

That's your basic card. There is not a lot of difference from card to card. But if you like the look -- which I do (a lot) -- then that is not a problem. I love the colors, the overwhelming blue and I like the L.A. backdrop. And I can ignore the "Ben Baller did the card" bragging on every card because everything else looks so cool.

The cards suffer the affliction of most Topps online sets in that the backs are absolutely mailed in. So don't look at the backs.

(Good lord, can we mention Baller a few more times?)

I know I've said in the past that I'm not paying for half a card, but when your team wins the World Series for the first time in 32 years, you're willing to overlook things. Some people might have a problem paying a dollar per card for a creation like this, and I get that, but they're also probably not Dodgers fans.
Just about everyone who appeared for the Dodgers in the World Series is in the set. That means no Gavin Lux card, rookie obsessives.

This gives you a good idea. Virtually every obscure reliever is in there. Even Jake McGee, who I was barely aware was still on the team when suddenly I saw him in a World Series game.
This set really underlines the overreliance on pitching these days. Fourteen of the cards of current players show pitchers. It should have been 15 but Victor Gonzalez is not included. This is rather glaring as Gonzalez appeared in four World Series games and was a life-saver for the Dodgers in the postseason.
My guess is Topps didn't have Gonzalez under contract as he was kind of a surprise showing on the Dodgers roster this year. If so, it's just one of the legal marks on this set.
If you noticed in the picture earlier that some of the cards in the bottom right corner didn't look like the others, then you spotted the "legends" forced into this set.
I think this set answered that question that I asked several posts ago when discussing the Super '70s set. Yes, indeedy, I believe Topps is legally required to shove legends into every set, whether it makes sense or not.
The Robinson card doesn't make sense at all, given that this set is obviously a tribute to L.A. and Robinson never played for the Los Angeles Dodgers. Also, I'm starting to believe that Topps' contract with Don Sutton requires that he not appear in cards with his trademark afro as we're getting another early '70s photo of him.
But overall I'm pretty happy with this set and it's an excellent way to remember the Dodgers' World Series title on cards. I actually wish stuff like this was around when the Dodgers won World Series titles in the 1980s.
But we all know Topps dropped the ball on that then.


Kershaw's photo is rather slovenly, unkempt & unflattering?, isn't it? I guess it doesn't matter since he's a Cy Young winner and now a World Series Champion. The presence of the historical figures is weird. Although I know Dodger Nation is sick, in some ways, of the 1988 heroics, why not Kirk Gibson?
Jeremya1um said…
Didn’t know this Ben Baller guy did a World Series set. It would’ve been funny to see him have to do a set if the Rays won. I bet Topps would’ve dropped the idea completely.
Glad you were able to get a nice commemorative set to celebrate the win. I probably would’ve done the same thing but stuck with the Topps set. You better get the 2021 Topps team set and any Topps/Heritage World Series highlights cards to compliment everything.
Good grab! I like this set and the look of the cards. The design does a great job of paying homage to the city of LA.
Brett Alan said…
Can't blame you at all for buying the set, especially at that price. I'd pay more for an auto...but not THAT much more! I mean, I want to say "the auto would have to be..." but I'm not sure there's a suitable way to finish that sentence.

I can't believe "Ben Baller did the card" is actually on the back. It sounds like what a 7 year old would say. Oh, my gosh, it's on the front AND the back! Yikes! Can I pretend that it's a dance craze? You know, Ben Baller did the card...and then he did the twist, and then he did the Boston monkey! And would it kill them to put, like, one line of World Series stats in there somewhere? OK, I've gotten a bit riled up here. Other than that it was a kick-ass set.
steelehere said…
I couldn’t bear to purchase that set or the $50 Topps Now nonsense they offered. From the price point to the design to the lack of actual game photos, everything about the Ben Baller set is horrible. Topps seriously dropped the ball (pun intended) this year as a $29.99 retail box set like they’ve done in years past with the Chicago Cubs and Panini did this year with the Lakers would have flown off the shelves based on the sales of other Dodgers World Series Champions merchandise.
night owl said…
Well, I don't know what the Lakers set looks like because it's Panini and basketball, but the Topps Cubs set was on the horrible 2016 design so already the Ben Baller set is better than that thing.
Fuji said…
The design and the checklist are solid. Plus you were able to grab it at a great price. Not sure if I'm headed down to LA this summer, but if I do... I'll keep an eye out for some cool WS shirts when I hit the flea markets.
Good buy. If I was a Dodgers guy, I'd have snapped these up too.
cardboardhogs said…
Ben Baller did all the things Ben Baller does when he Ben Ballers. There, i said it three times.

How do the cards feel "in-hand"? some of these topps special issue cards seem really thin. if the stock was thicker, they would be so so so much nicer.
Matt said…
Those are some nice looking cards! I wonder who did them....
night owl said…
@cardboardhogs ~

They're slick, which works well with the look of the set. They're typically thin, flagship set card stock.

Popular posts from this blog

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 80-71

  The longer you've been alive on this planet the more perspective you have on what "a long time ago" means.   A person I know is a Tampa Bay Buccaneers fan. He's pretty young. He says he's waited a long time for the Bucs to appear in the playoffs. It's been agony, you see, waiting all the way since ... 2007! ... to see his team in the postseason. How has he managed? As a Bills fan, I know waiting. Buffalo spent 17 straight years out of the playoffs, a longer wait than any other team. The last time Buffalo made the AFC championship game, where they are now, was 1994. That was the month of the Northridge earthquake in Los Angeles. That was the month I moved to the town where I live now. That was the month of 20-below temperatures for a week straight. That was a long time ago! A fellow co-worker said prior to Sunday that a Bills-Browns title game would sum up the 2020 NFL season, implying that these teams never make the postseason. But again, this is another ca

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 90-81

  I've been watching the Netflix documentary series on the doomed Challenger mission, whose anniversary is 35 years ago this month. Depressing viewing, I know. I was a college student at the time and heard the horrible news as I was driving to the bank to cash a paycheck after classes. I can't imagine what it was like for all those school classrooms that had tuned in to watch the broadcast that day. The documentary is quite well done, so far. The footage is incredible. Not just from all the space shuttle technology video and the awesome lift-off camera work but the depth of it. Every astronaut's every move from student eight years prior to the fateful day seems to have been cataloged. Also the background music is spot-on as far as time period (always a big thing with me) and takes me right back to those days. As always, it's difficult to believe that Jan. 28, 1986 was that long ago. I can still feel 1986 in my heart and that year still seems like it was on the cutting e

Saving vs. waiting

  Hello, it's contrarian night owl here, telling another tale about how obsessed we are with saving our cash.   I can tell you're shocked already.   Saving is a good thing, right? It's the American way. Getting the cheapest possible deal on whatever you're interested in purchasing gets you a little gold star or check mark somewhere, correct? Actually, I don't think that's the way it works. Which is why I haven't been much for trying to find the cheapest way to buy cards. I've addressed this before . I see the point if you're on a strict budget or your job status is shaky or you're paying tuition for three kids in college. But saving for saving's sake I just don't get. Sure, I get excited when I find a deal on ebay. And I pat myself on the back when I discover a shirt I bought that I like was on clearance. But it's never the point of the sale for me. The point is: did I get what I want? Recently, I think I found another point, when it