tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2700049103080920994.post5265175189646272441..comments2024-03-28T13:44:09.103-04:00Comments on Night Owl Cards: Those elusive '66snight owlhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11673973790245316059noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2700049103080920994.post-15873885528308172882020-06-28T01:06:35.374-04:002020-06-28T01:06:35.374-04:00Hi, there! It's Night Owl from the future! (Do...Hi, there! It's Night Owl from the future! (Don't go to 2020, it's a trap!) I'm here to say I now own this card. And the Perranoski, too. And card hoarding is still for losers.night owlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11673973790245316059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2700049103080920994.post-7802023645328650172014-11-21T15:02:43.277-05:002014-11-21T15:02:43.277-05:00Thanks for the shout out Night Owl! Thanks for the shout out Night Owl! Matt Flatenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01157226107144209201noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2700049103080920994.post-8069297679502164342014-11-17T09:03:41.761-05:002014-11-17T09:03:41.761-05:00Son of a biscuit. I collect Grant Jackson and nee...Son of a biscuit. I collect Grant Jackson and need one of these too! <br /><br />This is why I hate graded cards. Hype-inspired inflation beyond reasonable levels of regular card values...should be high book of the regular card and no more...GCAhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14713246271197550543noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2700049103080920994.post-21802257099960857432014-11-16T15:43:41.603-05:002014-11-16T15:43:41.603-05:00Ugh I haven't even started those yet. I have ...Ugh I haven't even started those yet. I have very few 52s at all. Hard for me to justify spending on them when that money can buy so many other cards. Plus 52 is like the ugliest set ever so not only are they expensive but everything else I can buy looks better.AdamEhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12107347958456472504noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2700049103080920994.post-22654880055956159902014-11-16T14:44:29.602-05:002014-11-16T14:44:29.602-05:00I have them all but the 52 hi numbersI have them all but the 52 hi numbersMark Hoylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05562266064195629037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2700049103080920994.post-7576673771366218012014-11-16T12:44:10.038-05:002014-11-16T12:44:10.038-05:00I never looked into why I don't have all the l...I never looked into why I don't have all the late 60s Red Sox yet I been concentrating on 50s sets. (And the T205 team set which I just finished this month, yeah!) But now that I look at my checklist I have many many high number 60s casts to get. And I thought 70 and 72 was bad. Late 60s looks even worse. Heck of Hoyle doesn't have them what chance do I have of getting them. AdamEhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12107347958456472504noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2700049103080920994.post-75931899285293817142014-11-15T23:25:00.923-05:002014-11-15T23:25:00.923-05:00i don't recall exactly what i paid for mine, b...i don't recall exactly what i paid for mine, but i assure you it wasn't $100. it was over $50, though. i was not too patient once i turned my attention to finding a copy.gcrlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09882449679093991427noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2700049103080920994.post-68531195734865809642014-11-14T21:49:24.046-05:002014-11-14T21:49:24.046-05:00I hunted for a reasonable Mark Belanger rookie (#5...I hunted for a reasonable Mark Belanger rookie (#558 of the high number 1967 series) for months if not years when I was trying to finish my Orioles team sets in the mid-80s. I finally found a guy at a show who had multiples cheap and I bought two. One went in the binder and one I framed as a 'souvenir'. Commishbobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18069472376708715755noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2700049103080920994.post-88234317221439654932014-11-14T21:38:20.450-05:002014-11-14T21:38:20.450-05:00I've run into a few of the same issues complet...I've run into a few of the same issues completing my 66 and 67 Sox sets. High numbers and short prints. Also I had to spring for a 63 that is also Willie Stagell rookie card just to get the no name Sox playerMark Hoylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05562266064195629037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2700049103080920994.post-53823815270505429212014-11-14T21:09:06.551-05:002014-11-14T21:09:06.551-05:00The 1966 Shirley/Jackson card is what made me give...The 1966 Shirley/Jackson card is what made me give up on collecting the 1966 set. I swear you have similar issues with the 1967 Topps Shellenback/White RC #592. Davehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13150792970138123909noreply@blogger.com